AI detectors ranked by the generator models the vendor names

Resemble Detect names 62 generator models on its product page, 22 voice, 20 image and 20 video generators from ElevenLabs to HunyuanVideo, the most of any detector in the index, per resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026. Turnitin names 35 model versions in its AI writing detection FAQ (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026), and Hive and Sightengine 33 each, read 8 and 9 November 2026. Fifty-six of the 72 cards name at least one generator; sixteen name none (Ircam Amplify at 11, Monica and Trinka at 4, Passed.ai at 2 and Writefull, Check For AI, Wordtune and ElevenLabs at 1 joined on 10 November 2026, then SEO.ai at 4 and Grammica, IvyPanda and AI Writing Check at 1 with the eleventh wave; Writer was recounted from 2 to 1 the same day because ChatGPT and GPT-4 are one GPT family under the rule every wave since the ninth has applied). Every count on this page is a vendor's own list of what it says it detects or trained against, read from the page the card cites, and no indexed study tests a vendor's list name by name.

Updated Vendor pages read 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day

Short answer

The sort is the count of distinct generator models, families or products the vendor names, a description of 36 vendor lists and not a measure of what any detector catches: Resemble Detect 62, read 9 November 2026; Turnitin 35, read 8 November 2026; Hive 33 and Sightengine 33, read 8 and 9 November 2026, Hive first on study records; Pangram 16; Copyleaks 15 and AI or Not 15; TruthScan 13; WasItAI 12; ZeroGPT, Sapling and Phrasly 11 each; GPTZero, Originality.ai and Winston AI 10 each; down to GLTR and the GPT-2 Output Detector at one model each, GPT-2. A vendor list is a claim about coverage; where a vendor prints a headline count ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators", "250+ models") that exceeds its names, the headline is printed beside the count and not counted. No detector score should be the only evidence in a misconduct or hiring decision, whichever models the vendor names.

How we ranked

AI detectors ranked by the generator models the vendor names: register plate with the page title and its register ID
Generator models or families the vendor names per detector, from the index data file.

Which AI detectors name the most AI models they claim to detect?

AI detectors ranked by the generator models the vendor names: the decision table
RankDetectorGenerators namedThe names, source and read date, and the vendor's claim figureStudy recordsBest forMain limitation
1Resemble Detect62 named22 voice generators from ElevenLabs to HierSpeech++, 20 image generators from DALL-E 3 to Emu, 20 video generators from Sora to HunyuanVideo (resemble.ai/products/detect, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "250+ generative AI models" and "over 100 more" voice tools, unnamed0Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generatorsEvery figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect
2Turnitin35 named35 named model versions, from Amazon Nova 2 Lite and Claude-3-Haiku to GPT-5.4-pro, Grok-4.1 and Mistral-large-3, plus the Spanish and Japanese model generators (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none; the FAQ lists versions rather than families5Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence coversA version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20%
3Hive33 named19 image and video source classes from sora and pika to gptimage1_5 and grok, 14 music attribution classes from duobao to ace_step; text: not published (docs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "about 90 further classes" for image and video, unnamed2Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one didThe text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies
4Sightengine33 namedNano Banana, GPT image, DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Imagen, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Grok Imagine, 13 further image generators from Seedream to Cosmos, StyleGAN, and 9 video generators from Sora to Midjourney Video (sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and others" for video, unnamed1Developers checking which image models a per-generator score coversImage and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary
5Pangram16 named16 models benchmarked by name, Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6, Gemini 3, Grok 4.3, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.4, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek V4, Llama 3.3, Mistral Medium 3.5, Kimi K2.6, Qwen 3.7 Max, Gemma 4, Nemotron 3 Ultra and GLM 5.2; six company names stand behind them (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "26 models benchmarked"; the home page names 164Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are namedThe page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card
6Copyleaks15 namedGPT-5, GPT-4, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama, Bloom, Rytr, Jasper for text; DALL-E, Imagen, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and Flux for images (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and more"9Institutions that want named coverage of the writing assistants Rytr and Jasper beside the LLMsNine records and none tests the named list; Orenstrakh 2023 flagged 10 of 10 Spanish human theses
7AI or Not15 namedNano Banana, Midjourney, DALL-E / GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Grok / Aurora, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Recraft, Seedream, Qwen and GAN models for images; ChatGPT, Claude and Meta LLaMa for text (aiornot.com/ai-image-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: image coverage "last updated July 2026"1Marketplaces screening product images from named generatorsThe text list is three names; the one record scored images under the Optic name with a 24.47% false positive rate
8TruthScan13 namedChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, Bard, Jasper and Copy.ai for text; Nano Banana 2, Seedream 4.5, Imagen 4, Grok, Flux 2 Pro, GPT-Image 1.5 and Midjourney for images (truthscan.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "500+ generators" for images and "hundreds of other AI writing tools", unnamed0Teams checking images from the seven named 2026 generatorsThirteen names against a 500+ claim; no indexed study has scored TruthScan
9WasItAI12 namedMidjourney, DALL-E, GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Flux, Imagen, Nano Banana, Grok, Bing Image Creator, StyleGAN, BigGAN (wasitai.com, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none0Buyers and editors checking a single image from a named generatorImages only; no indexed study has scored WasItAI
10ZeroGPT11 namedChat GPT, GPT 3, GPT 4, GPT 5, GPT 6, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity AI, Claude, DeepSeek and LLaMa models (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "35+ LLM families", unnamed beyond the eleven7Readers checking text from Perplexity or Grok output, which few cards nameEleven names against a 35+ claim; 13 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023
11Sapling11 namedGPT-5, ChatGPT, the OpenAI GPT family, Claude 4.5, Claude 5.5, Gemini 2.5, Qwen3, DeepSeek-V3, Kimi, Llama and Mistral (sapling.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none3Teams checking Claude 5.5 or Qwen3 output through an APIThree records, none on the named list; 31% of human papers returned uncertain in Walters 2023
12Ircam Amplify11 namedACE-Step, ElevenLabs Music (versions 1 and 2), Suno (versions 3 to 6), Lyria, Mureka, Riffusion, Treblo (formerly Sonauto), Udio, and the legacy opt-in Boomy, LDM2 and MusicGen (docs.ircamamplify.io, model coverage, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% (accuracy)0Labels checking tracks from the named music generatorsThe three legacy generators are excluded by default; every figure is the vendor's own; no study record
13Phrasly11 namedChatGPT (4o, 5 and 5.1), GPT-5, Claude, Google Gemini, Bard, Meta Llama, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, Jasper and Copy.ai (phrasly.ai/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and other AI writers"0Moderators scoring short posts from named chat modelsThe vendor sells a humanizer and no indexed study has tested its detector
14GPTZero10 namedClaude, ChatGPT, GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5, GPT-6, Gemini, Llama, Deepseek and Grok (gptzero.me/faq, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "AI services based on those models"16Teachers who want GPT-6 and Grok named on the FAQSixteen records, none on the named list; 9 of 18 false accusations in Weber-Wulff 2023
15Originality.ai10 namedGPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3, Gemini 4 Argon, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, Grok 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick and Scout (originality.ai, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and more"7Content teams checking drafts from the newest named GPT-6 and Gemini 4 variantsSeven records, none on the named list; 19 of 495 human passages flagged in Epoch AI 2026
16Winston AI10 namedChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini and LLaMA for text; Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Nano Banana, ChatGPT Image and Adobe Firefly for images (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "many others" for text2Schools checking both an essay and its illustrationsFour text names; neither record tests the named list
17PlagiarismCheck10 namedChatGPT, GPT-4o, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini Flash 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3, Llama 3 (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure: "the seven most recent AI models we tested"1Readers who want dated model versions named rather than familiesEvery version is the vendor's own list; the one record (2023) predates all of them
18Isgen10 namedChatGPT, GPT-6, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, LLaMa, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen (isgen.ai, read 9 November 2026)0Readers who want open-weight families (LLaMa, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen) namedNo study record; the 96.4% claim names no benchmark
19Proofademic9 namedChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude and Gemini on the detector page; Meta, Mistral, DeepSeek, Alibaba and xAI as companies on the research page (proofademic.ai/?utm_source=aidetectorinde..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other LLMs"0Academic users checking text from the companies named in the vendor's own testFive of the nine are company names from a research page; no indexed study has scored Proofademic
20Quetext9 namedChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Mistral on the current page; Bard, GPT-3 and GPT-4 on older page copy (quetext.com/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none; the older copy adds three retired names0Writers checking Mistral output, which few cards nameThree of the nine names come from older page copy; no indexed study has scored Quetext
21Codequiry8 namedChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Claude, Grok, Google Gemini, Cursor AI, Amazon Q Developer and Meta Llama (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: a "General AI Detection model for any AI-generated code patterns"0Computer science departments checking Copilot, Cursor and Amazon Q outputCode only; no indexed study has scored Codequiry
22JustDone8 namedChatGPT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and DeepSeek (justdone.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "additional open-source and commercial LLMs"0Students on a Chrome extension who want GPT-3.5 to GPT-5 namedNo indexed study has scored JustDone
23SynthID8 namedImagen, Veo, Lyria, Gemini and NotebookLM audio, watermarked at generation; NVIDIA Cosmos, OpenAI and Kakao as partners (synthid.com, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: Apple "coming soon", not counted0Newsrooms receiving Google, NVIDIA or partner outputA watermark list, not a detection list: unwatermarked output from the same models returns nothing
24DetectGPT7 namedGPT-2 (1.5B), OPT-2.7B, GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J (6B), GPT-NeoX (20B), GPT-3 and Jurassic-2 Jumbo (175B), the models the paper evaluated (arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: any model whose token log probabilities can be read, white-box4Researchers running the method against an open modelA research method with no product page; the hosted demo is gone
25Scribbr7 namedChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, GPT2, GPT3, GPT3.5 and GPT4 (scribbr.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: GPT4 "experimental in free tool; supported in Premium"1Students checking older GPT outputNo GPT-5 or Claude named; the one record, Walters 2023, printed 1 of 42 false positives
26Undetectable AI7 namedChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and Llama (undetectable.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other leading AI writing models"1Readers who want a free 10,000-word check against named modelsThe vendor sells a humanizer; the one record scored a single text
27Content Detector AI6 namedChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-4o, o1, Gemini, Claude on the archived page of 11 May 2026 (web.archive.org, read 9 November 2026)3Readers who want the archived list of a tool three studies testedThe page redirected by 9 November 2026; 7% of 42 GPT-4 papers correct in Walters 2023
28QuillBot6 namedGPT-6, GPT-5, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Llama (quillbot.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other LLMs"2Students who want GPT-6 named on a free toolThe two records print scores on single texts, not rates
29Grammarly6 namedChatGPT, GPT-6, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot and Grammarly's own generative AI (grammarly.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other tools"0Grammarly users checking Copilot or Grammarly-assisted draftsNo indexed study has scored Grammarly's detector
30Smodin6 namedChatGPT and GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Copilot (smodin.io/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other popular AI language models"0Readers with a 50,000-character documentNo indexed study has scored Smodin
31BrandWell4 namedChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude Sonnet and Google Gemini (web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "various other language models" on an archived page3Readers of the three 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stoodThe list is from an archived page of 9 August 2026; Weber-Wulff 2023 missed 36 of 36 AI documents
32SEO.ai4 namedChatGPT and GPT-4 as one GPT family, Bard, Claude, Gemini ("Detect AI-generated content from ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, Claude, and Gemini in any language", seo.ai/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none1Marketers checking copy from the four named families without a loginThe one record tested papers from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 only; 12% of 42 human papers called AI
33Monica4 namedGPT (GPT, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in one list), Claude, Gemini, LLaMa (monica.im/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: "over 8 of the most advanced AI models", 98% (detection accuracy)0Readers who want the four large families named by an assistant's built-in detectorThe page's "over 8" is a claim figure, not a list; the detector calls three third-party engines; no study record
34Trinka4 namedChatGPT (GPT-X), Claude, Gemini (Gemini-X), Llama (Llama-X) (trinka.ai/features/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99.9% (accuracy) for academic text0Researchers who want the four families named by a manuscript tool"and more" names nothing; the RAID leaderboard entry is self-submitted; no study record
35Walter Writes4 namedChatGPT (GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5), Claude, Gemini and Llama (walterwrites.ai/ai-detector/?utm_source=a..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: Llama "API testing"0Teams on the Chrome extension checking GPT, Claude and Gemini draftsFour names and no indexed study
36Compilatio3 namedChatGPT, Gemini and Claude; the v4.6.2 model was trained against 2026 versions of the three (compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other generative AI systems"1European institutions asking which model versions the 2026 release was trained onThree names; the one record tested the 2023 free tool
37Illuminarty3 namedDalle2, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, from the release post's validation table (illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: the generator count "will gradually increase"1Readers of Ha and Passananti 2024 who want the vendor's own listThree 2023 names; Ha and Passananti 2024 recorded a 67.40% false positive rate on human artworks
38AI Detector Pro3 namedChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3 and o4 named inside one FAQ item), Gemini, Claude (aidetector.pro/pages/faq, read 10 November 2026)0Readers who want the three large families namedVersion variants inside one item are not added; no study record
39AIDetectPlus3 namedChatGPT, Gemini and Claude (aidetectplus.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "any GPT-family model"0Students on a one-time 1,000-credit free allowanceThree names; no indexed study has scored AIDetectPlus
40Decopy3 namedChatGPT, Claude, Gemini (decopy.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026)0Readers who want the three large families named freeNo study record; no accuracy rate published
41Detecting-AI.com3 namedChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4o and earlier GPT models), Claude, Gemini (detecting-ai.com, read 10 November 2026)0Readers who want the three families named by a no-account toolNo study record; the 99% claim has no base
42Grammarly Authorship3 namedChatGPT, Claude and Grammarly's own generative AI, attributed from the clipboard (support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "any other generative AI site where the browser extension runs"0Writing instructors who want sources attributed rather than text classifiedAttribution needs the extension running at paste time; a new AI tool may not yet be categorised
43Paperpal3 namedChatGPT, Gemini, Claude; "100,000+ human and AI scholarly samples from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini" (paperpal.com/tools/ai-detector, read 10 November 2026)0Researchers who want the training scope stated as scholarly textNo study record; the 99% claim is the vendor's own
44Surfer3 namedChatGPT, Claude and Google Gemini (surfer.ai/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other AI content generators, including content altered by writing tools or AI rewriters"0Content teams inside SurferThree names; no indexed study has scored Surfer
45Passed.ai2 namedGPT (ChatGPT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and GPT-4 in one FAQ item), GPT-J (web.archive.org, 7 June 2026, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% (accurate) on GPT-4, attributed to Originality.ai's engine0Teachers reading what the closing product claimed to coverThe list is Originality.ai's engine's; the service is closing; no study record
46GPT-2 Output Detector1 namedGPT-2, the 1.5B model whose output the RoBERTa classifier was fine-tuned on (huggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: the model card says not to use it as a ChatGPT detector12Researchers who want a 2019 baseline against 2023 to 2025 toolsOne model from 2019; 0.9503 of 1,992 human passages flagged in Jabarian and Imas 2025
47Writer1 namedGPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family, recounted 10 November 2026 under the sitewide rule), from the archived page of 9 December 2025 (web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none5Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimedThe tool was withdrawn on 22 December 2025; 19 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023
48GLTR1 namedGPT-2, the 117M model behind the public demo and the 1.5B model in the paper (gltr.io, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: BERT as an alternative backend, not a generator4Readers of the four records that ran GLTROne model; 100% of human documents flagged at the loosest RAID threshold
49GPTKit1 namedChatGPT, the only generator the home page names (gptkit.ai, read 9 November 2026)2Readers who want a scope statement limited to ChatGPTTwo records, 2023 and 2024, both on ChatGPT text; nothing newer is claimed
50Writefull1 namedGPT (GPT-3, GPT-4 and ChatGPT in one family) (web.archive.org, 31 December 2024, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: none2Readers checking what the discontinued tool claimedDiscontinued before 7 March 2025; 18 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023
51AI Writing Check1 namedChatGPT ("to enable educators to check if a piece of writing submitted by a student was written by the AI tool ChatGPT", web.archive.org, 17 July 2023, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none1Readers tracing what the withdrawn nonprofit tool targetedWithdrawn since August 2023; the one record prints an averaged rate
52Check For AI1 namedGPT (ChatGPT and GPT in one family) (web.archive.org, 27 May 2023, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: none for the product (95% attributed to OpenAI's RoBERTa model)1Readers checking what the sunset tool claimedSunset in July 2023; the engine was OpenAI's RoBERTa model plus the vendor's own
53Grammica1 namedGPT ("identify AI-written text from Chat GPT 3 and other AI models", web.archive.org, 31 July 2025, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other AI models", unnamed1Readers tracing what the withdrawn free tool targetedRemoved in the January 2026 relaunch; 17% of 84 AI papers called human in the one record
54IvyPanda1 namedGPT ("It is up to you to decide if the text is Chat GPT generated or not"; the FAQ defines GPT, ivypanda.com/tools/gpt-essay-checker, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none1Students checking a ChatGPT-era essay in a free colour mapA beta with no figure; 23% of 126 documents uncertain in the one record
55Wordtune1 namedGPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 in the page title) (web.archive.org, 30 March 2025, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: over 99% (accuracy rate)1Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimedThe page has returned 404 since July 2025; the one record scored one text
56ElevenLabs Classifier1 namedElevenLabs, the vendor's own models; Eleven v3 is stated as not reliably classified (elevenlabs.io/ai-speech-classifier, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% precision, 80% recall0Readers checking whether a clip came from ElevenLabsA self-detector: audio from other providers is stated as not detected; no study record

Cards that name no generator

DetectorWhat the generators field statesSource, read date
Reality Defender"Not named by generator": the vendor lists manipulation types (face swaps, generated video, altered faces, synthetic speech, AI-agent callers)realitydefender.com/deepfake-video-detection, read 9 November 2026
Turnitin ClarityNo generators field: Clarity records the writing process and shows AI writing results through the Originality add-onguides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/376..., read 9 November 2026
DeepwareFace manipulation deepfakes only; the FAQ states the scanner does not detect voice, images or textdeepware.ai/us/faq/index.html, read 9 November 2026
SensityManipulation and content types (face swap, lip sync, GAN faces, text-to-image, voice cloning); a Model Generator attribution with no published listsensity.ai/deepfake-detection-for-video-i..., read 9 November 2026
CodeleaksNo generator list for code; the launch release names ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot as sources of AI code, not as detection coveragecopyleaks.com/about-us/press-releases/cop..., read 9 November 2026
Pindrop Pulse"350+ deepfake generation tools", "120 AI voice generation systems" and "32 engines" as counts, none namedpindrop.com/company-news/pindrop-launches..., read 9 November 2026
BinocularsThe paper's experiment generators (ChatGPT, LLaMA-2, Falcon-7B, the M4 models) describe what was tested, not a vendor coverage claim; no product list existsgithub.com/ahans30/Binoculars, read 10 November 2026
StealthWriterThe detector page names no generator; the FAQ's model list answers "What kind of AI text can it humanize?" and is quoted, not countedstealthwriter.ai/faq, read 10 November 2026
FakeCatcherNo generator list; the newsroom post describes deepfakes of real people and the paper names evaluation datasetsintel.com newsroom, 14 November 2022, read 10 November 2026
Deepfake-O-MeterNo single platform list; each hosted detector states its own scope (ProGAN to DALL-E for CLIP-ViT, FaceForensics++ manipulations for AltFreezing, ASVspoof for AASIST)detectors endpoint, read 10 November 2026
GPT RadarThe page names GPT-3 as the engine ("We use OpenAI GPT-3 to analyze a piece of text") and no model as a targetweb.archive.org, 12 July 2026, read 10 November 2026
RADARThe paper's eight target LLMs (Vicuna-7B as the released detector's training target, Pythia-2.8B to LLaMA-7B) and a GPT-4 transfer test describe what was tested, not a vendor coverage claimhuggingface.co/TrustSafeAI/RADAR-Vicuna-7B, read 10 November 2026
GhostbusterChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo) for the three released datasets and Claude in a generalisation test describe the experiments, not a coverage claimgithub.com/vivek3141/ghostbuster, read 10 November 2026
Hiya Deepfake Detector"Detects voices created by all popular voice synthesis tools", unnamedChrome Web Store listing, read 10 November 2026
McAfee Deepfake Detector"AI-generated audio" from models "trained on close to 200,000 samples", no generator namedmcafee.com newsroom, 21 August 2024, read 10 November 2026

One of the plan rankings in the rankings hub, beside languages, which counts the languages a vendor states, and claim vs evidence gap, which sets accuracy claims beside study results. The ChatGPT coverage question reads one name across the cards; this page counts all of them. The home board answers which AI detectors name the models they detect?

Which AI detectors should you check first?

  • Resemble Detect, rank 1Best for: Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generators. Main limitation: Every figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect.
  • Turnitin, rank 2Best for: Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence covers. Main limitation: A version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20%.
  • Hive, rank 3Best for: Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one did. Main limitation: The text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies.
  • Sightengine, rank 4Best for: Developers checking which image models a per-generator score covers. Main limitation: Image and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary.
  • Pangram, rank 5Best for: Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are named. Main limitation: The page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card.

What does each vendor name, tool by tool?

1

Resemble Detect

Verdict
Fits readers who want the longest vendor list in the index, on media rather than text.
Value
62 named: ElevenLabs, OpenAI TTS, Azure TTS, Google TTS, AWS Polly, Suno, Udio, PlayHT, Murf, Descript Overdub, Bark, VALL-E, VALL-E 2, YourTTS, Tortoise TTS, XTTS, StyleTTS 2, MetaVoice, Kokoro, VoiceBox, NaturalSpeech 3, HierSpeech++, DALL-E 3, Midjourney v6 and v7, Stable Diffusion SDXL and SD 3.5, Nano Banana, Flux v2, Gemini Imagen 3 and 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o image generation, StyleGAN v2 and v3, Ideogram v2 and v3, Leonardo AI, Latent Diffusion, eDiff-I, GLIDE, Kandinsky, DeepFloyd IF, Playground v3, Grok Aurora, Recraft v3, Lumina Image, Emu (Meta), Sora, Veo, Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Gen-2, HeyGen, Pika, Kling, Seedance, Synthesia, D-ID, CogVideoX, Wan 2.1, Open-Sora, ModelScope, VideoCrafter, AnimateDiff, VideoPoet, Make-A-Video, Morph Studio, Mochi 1, HunyuanVideo (resemble.ai/products/detect, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "250+ generative AI models" and "over 100 more" voice tools, unnamed.
Best for
Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generators
Main limitation
Every figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect
Read the Resemble Detect card
2

Turnitin

Verdict
Fits institutions that want to see which model versions a vendor says it trained against.
Value
35 named: Amazon Nova 2 Lite, Claude-3-Haiku, Claude Sonnet-3.5, Claude Sonnet-3.7, Claude-Haiku-4.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, DeepSeek V3.2, Gemini-1.0-pro, Gemini-1.5-pro, Gemini-2.0-flash, Gemini-2.5-flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini-3-flash-preview, Gemini-3-pro-preview, Gemini-3.1-pro-preview, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano, GPT-5.1, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.2 Pro, GPT-5.3, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4-pro, o1-mini, Grok-4.1, Llama-3.3-70b, Llama-4-Maverick-17b, Mistral-large-3, GPT-3.5 (Spanish model), GPT-4 (Spanish and Japanese models) (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none; the FAQ lists versions rather than families.
Best for
Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence covers
Main limitation
A version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20%
Read the Turnitin card
3

Hive

Verdict
Fits moderation teams that want per-generator attribution on images, video and music.
Value
33 named: sora, pika, kling, luma, runway, flux, dalle, stablediffusion, midjourney, imagen, adobefirefly, bingimagecreator, ideogram, gemini, veo3, imagen4, sora2, gptimage1_5, grok, duobao, google (music), heartmula, loudly, minimax, mubert, mureka, musicgen, riffusion, stable_audio_open, suno, udio, yue, ace_step (docs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "about 90 further classes" for image and video, unnamed.
Best for
Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one did
Main limitation
The text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies
Read the Hive card
4

Sightengine

Verdict
Fits image and video API customers who want a dated, named generator list.
Value
33 named: Nano Banana, GPT image generation, DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Imagen, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Grok Imagine, Seedream, Reve, Recraft, Krea, Qwen, HiDream, Higgsfield, Hunyuan, Kling, MAI-Image, Vidu, Z-image, Cosmos, StyleGAN2 and StyleGAN3, Sora, Veo, Runway Gen-2 to Gen-4, Pika, Hailuo, Seedance, Wan, LTX, Midjourney Video (sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and others" for video, unnamed.
Best for
Developers checking which image models a per-generator score covers
Main limitation
Image and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary
Read the Sightengine card
5

Pangram

Verdict
Fits readers who want a model list that names 2026 frontier models and open weights alike.
Value
16 named: Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6, Gemini 3, Grok 4.3, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.4, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek V4, Llama 3.3, Mistral Medium 3.5, Kimi K2.6, Qwen 3.7 Max, Gemma 4, Nemotron 3 Ultra, GLM 5.2 (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "26 models benchmarked"; the home page names 16.
Best for
Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are named
Main limitation
The page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card
Read the Pangram card
6

Copyleaks

Verdict
Fits readers who want text and image generator lists from one vendor with nine study records.
Value
15 named: GPT-5, GPT-4, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama (Meta), Bloom, Rytr, Jasper, DALL-E, Imagen, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and more".
Best for
Institutions that want named coverage of the writing assistants Rytr and Jasper beside the LLMs
Main limitation
Nine records and none tests the named list; Orenstrakh 2023 flagged 10 of 10 Spanish human theses
Read the Copyleaks card
7

AI or Not

Verdict
Fits image checkers who want a dated list of 2026 generators.
Value
15 named: Nano Banana, Midjourney, DALL-E / GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Grok / Aurora, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Recraft, Seedream, Qwen, StyleGAN and GAN models, ChatGPT (text), Claude (text), Meta LLaMa (text) (aiornot.com/ai-image-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: image coverage "last updated July 2026".
Best for
Marketplaces screening product images from named generators
Main limitation
The text list is three names; the one record scored images under the Optic name with a 24.47% false positive rate
Read the AI or Not card
8

TruthScan

Verdict
Fits readers who want to see how far a vendor's named list sits below its headline figure.
Value
13 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, Bard, Jasper, Copy.ai, Nano Banana 2, Seedream 4.5, Imagen 4, Grok, Flux 2 Pro, GPT-Image 1.5, Midjourney (truthscan.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "500+ generators" for images and "hundreds of other AI writing tools", unnamed.
Best for
Teams checking images from the seven named 2026 generators
Main limitation
Thirteen names against a 500+ claim; no indexed study has scored TruthScan
Read the TruthScan card
9

WasItAI

Verdict
Fits readers checking images from the twelve named generators.
Value
12 named: Midjourney, DALL-E, GPT Image (OpenAI), Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Flux, Imagen (Google), Nano Banana, Grok, Bing Image Creator, StyleGAN, BigGAN (wasitai.com, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none.
Best for
Buyers and editors checking a single image from a named generator
Main limitation
Images only; no indexed study has scored WasItAI
Read the WasItAI card
10

ZeroGPT

Verdict
Fits readers who want a free text tool with a broad named list and seven study records.
Value
11 named: Chat GPT, GPT 3, GPT 4, GPT 5, GPT 6, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity AI, Claude, DeepSeek, LLaMa models (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "35+ LLM families", unnamed beyond the eleven.
Best for
Readers checking text from Perplexity or Grok output, which few cards name
Main limitation
Eleven names against a 35+ claim; 13 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023
Read the ZeroGPT card
11

Sapling

Verdict
Fits developers who want model versions named on the detector page itself.
Value
11 named: GPT-5, ChatGPT, OpenAI GPT family, Claude 4.5, Claude 5.5, Gemini 2.5, Qwen3, DeepSeek-V3, Kimi, Llama, Mistral (sapling.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none.
Best for
Teams checking Claude 5.5 or Qwen3 output through an API
Main limitation
Three records, none on the named list; 31% of human papers returned uncertain in Walters 2023
Read the Sapling card
13

Phrasly

Verdict
Fits readers who want a list that names writing assistants beside the chat models.
Value
11 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Google Gemini, Bard, Meta Llama, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, Jasper, Copy.ai (phrasly.ai/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and other AI writers".
Best for
Moderators scoring short posts from named chat models
Main limitation
The vendor sells a humanizer and no indexed study has tested its detector
Read the Phrasly card
14

GPTZero

Verdict
Fits readers who want the card with the most study records and a ten-name list.
Value
10 named: Claude, ChatGPT, GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5, GPT-6, Gemini, Llama, Deepseek, Grok (gptzero.me/faq, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "AI services based on those models".
Best for
Teachers who want GPT-6 and Grok named on the FAQ
Main limitation
Sixteen records, none on the named list; 9 of 18 false accusations in Weber-Wulff 2023
Read the GPTZero card
15

Originality.ai

Verdict
Fits publishers who want 2026 model versions named on the home page.
Value
10 named: GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3, Gemini 4 Argon, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, Grok 4.7, Llama 4 Maverick and Scout (originality.ai, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and more".
Best for
Content teams checking drafts from the newest named GPT-6 and Gemini 4 variants
Main limitation
Seven records, none on the named list; 19 of 495 human passages flagged in Epoch AI 2026
Read the Originality.ai card
16

Winston AI

Verdict
Fits readers who want text and image lists from a card with two records.
Value
10 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, LLaMA, Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Nano Banana, ChatGPT Image, Adobe Firefly (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "many others" for text.
Best for
Schools checking both an essay and its illustrations
Main limitation
Four text names; neither record tests the named list
Read the Winston AI card
19

Proofademic

Verdict
Fits readers who want the research page's eight-company test set beside the detector list.
Value
9 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Meta (research page), Mistral (research page), DeepSeek (research page), Alibaba (research page), xAI (research page) (proofademic.ai/?utm_source=aidetectorinde..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other LLMs".
Best for
Academic users checking text from the companies named in the vendor's own test
Main limitation
Five of the nine are company names from a research page; no indexed study has scored Proofademic
Read the Proofademic card
20

Quetext

Verdict
Fits readers who want to see how a list ages across page versions.
Value
9 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, Bard, GPT-3, GPT-4 (quetext.com/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none; the older copy adds three retired names.
Best for
Writers checking Mistral output, which few cards name
Main limitation
Three of the nine names come from older page copy; no indexed study has scored Quetext
Read the Quetext card
21

Codequiry

Verdict
Fits instructors who want coding assistants named, not only chat models.
Value
8 named: ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Claude, Grok, Google Gemini, Cursor AI, Amazon Q Developer (CodeWhisperer), Meta Llama (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: a "General AI Detection model for any AI-generated code patterns".
Best for
Computer science departments checking Copilot, Cursor and Amazon Q output
Main limitation
Code only; no indexed study has scored Codequiry
Read the Codequiry card
22

JustDone

Verdict
Fits readers checking text from the eight named chat models.
Value
8 named: ChatGPT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek (justdone.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "additional open-source and commercial LLMs".
Best for
Students on a Chrome extension who want GPT-3.5 to GPT-5 named
Main limitation
No indexed study has scored JustDone
Read the JustDone card
23

SynthID

Verdict
Fits readers who want to know whose output carries a SynthID watermark.
Value
8 named: Imagen, Veo, Lyria, Gemini, NotebookLM audio, NVIDIA Cosmos, OpenAI (partner), Kakao (partner) (synthid.com, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: Apple "coming soon", not counted.
Best for
Newsrooms receiving Google, NVIDIA or partner output
Main limitation
A watermark list, not a detection list: unwatermarked output from the same models returns nothing
Read the SynthID card
24

DetectGPT

Verdict
Fits researchers who want the paper's evaluation set rather than a product claim.
Value
7 named: GPT-2 (1.5B), OPT-2.7B, GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J (6B), GPT-NeoX (20B), GPT-3, Jurassic-2 Jumbo (175B) (arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: any model whose token log probabilities can be read, white-box.
Best for
Researchers running the method against an open model
Main limitation
A research method with no product page; the hosted demo is gone
Read the DetectGPT card
25

Scribbr

Verdict
Fits students who want GPT-2 to GPT-4 named on a free tool.
Value
7 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, GPT2, GPT3, GPT3.5, GPT4 (scribbr.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: GPT4 "experimental in free tool; supported in Premium".
Best for
Students checking older GPT output
Main limitation
No GPT-5 or Claude named; the one record, Walters 2023, printed 1 of 42 false positives
Read the Scribbr card
26

Undetectable AI

Verdict
Fits readers checking text from the seven named chat models on a free tool.
Value
7 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama (undetectable.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other leading AI writing models".
Best for
Readers who want a free 10,000-word check against named models
Main limitation
The vendor sells a humanizer; the one record scored a single text
Read the Undetectable AI card
28

QuillBot

Verdict
Fits students inside the QuillBot suite checking text from six named models.
Value
6 named: GPT-6, GPT-5, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Llama (quillbot.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other LLMs".
Best for
Students who want GPT-6 named on a free tool
Main limitation
The two records print scores on single texts, not rates
Read the QuillBot card
29

Grammarly

Verdict
Fits writers who want a vendor that names its own generator among the six.
Value
6 named: ChatGPT, GPT-6, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grammarly (grammarly.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other tools".
Best for
Grammarly users checking Copilot or Grammarly-assisted drafts
Main limitation
No indexed study has scored Grammarly's detector
Read the Grammarly card
30

Smodin

Verdict
Fits readers checking long text free against six named models.
Value
6 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Copilot (smodin.io/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other popular AI language models".
Best for
Readers with a 50,000-character document
Main limitation
No indexed study has scored Smodin
Read the Smodin card
31

BrandWell

Verdict
Fits readers who want the list from a page that has since redirected.
Value
4 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude Sonnet, Google Gemini (web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "various other language models" on an archived page.
Best for
Readers of the three 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stood
Main limitation
The list is from an archived page of 9 August 2026; Weber-Wulff 2023 missed 36 of 36 AI documents
Read the BrandWell card
35

Walter Writes

Verdict
Fits teams checking text from the four named families.
Value
4 named: ChatGPT (GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5), Claude, Gemini, Llama (walterwrites.ai/ai-detector/?utm_source=a..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: Llama "API testing".
Best for
Teams on the Chrome extension checking GPT, Claude and Gemini drafts
Main limitation
Four names and no indexed study
Read the Walter Writes card
36

Compilatio

Verdict
Fits institutions that want the training generation stated beside the names.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude (compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other generative AI systems".
Best for
European institutions asking which model versions the 2026 release was trained on
Main limitation
Three names; the one record tested the 2023 free tool
Read the Compilatio card
37

Illuminarty

Verdict
Fits readers who want to see the 2023 validation set behind an image detector.
Value
3 named: Dalle2, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion (illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: the generator count "will gradually increase".
Best for
Readers of Ha and Passananti 2024 who want the vendor's own list
Main limitation
Three 2023 names; Ha and Passananti 2024 recorded a 67.40% false positive rate on human artworks
Read the Illuminarty card
39

AIDetectPlus

Verdict
Fits readers checking text from the three named models.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude (aidetectplus.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "any GPT-family model".
Best for
Students on a one-time 1,000-credit free allowance
Main limitation
Three names; no indexed study has scored AIDetectPlus
Read the AIDetectPlus card
42

Grammarly Authorship

Verdict
Fits readers who want a process record of which AI site text was pasted from.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Grammarly's own generative AI (support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "any other generative AI site where the browser extension runs".
Best for
Writing instructors who want sources attributed rather than text classified
Main limitation
Attribution needs the extension running at paste time; a new AI tool may not yet be categorised
Read the Grammarly Authorship card
44

Surfer

Verdict
Fits SEO teams checking drafts from the three named models.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini (surfer.ai/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other AI content generators, including content altered by writing tools or AI rewriters".
Best for
Content teams inside Surfer
Main limitation
Three names; no indexed study has scored Surfer
Read the Surfer card
47

Writer

Verdict
Fits readers of the five 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stood.
Value
1 named: GPT, with ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family (web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none. Recounted from 2 on 10 November 2026: the sitewide rule counts the GPT family once, as it does for Wordtune, Writefull and Check For AI, which name the same pair.
Best for
Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimed
Main limitation
The tool was withdrawn on 22 December 2025; 19 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023
Read the Writer card
46

GPT-2 Output Detector

Verdict
Fits researchers who want the baseline twelve studies ran.
Value
1 named: GPT-2 (huggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: the model card says not to use it as a ChatGPT detector.
Best for
Researchers who want a 2019 baseline against 2023 to 2025 tools
Main limitation
One model from 2019; 0.9503 of 1,992 human passages flagged in Jabarian and Imas 2025
Read the GPT-2 Output Detector card
48

GLTR

Verdict
Fits researchers who want the 2019 visual tool's own scope.
Value
1 named: GPT-2 (gltr.io, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: BERT as an alternative backend, not a generator.
Best for
Readers of the four records that ran GLTR
Main limitation
One model; 100% of human documents flagged at the loosest RAID threshold
Read the GLTR card
17

PlagiarismCheck

Verdict
Fits readers who want a vendor list with model versions rather than family names.
Value
10 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4o, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini Flash 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3 and Llama 3, with the benchmark post describing "the seven most recent AI models we tested" (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Readers who want to see which 2026 models a vendor says it tested.
Main limitation
The list and the 99,23% beside it are the vendor's own; the one indexed record, Weber-Wulff 2023, tested GPT-3.5 text in May 2023 and ranked the tool 13th of 14.
Read the PlagiarismCheck card
18

Isgen

Verdict
Fits readers who want the open-weight families named beside the three commercial ones.
Value
10 named: ChatGPT, GPT-6, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, LLaMa, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek and Qwen (isgen.ai, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Readers checking text from a DeepSeek or Qwen model, which few vendor lists name.
Main limitation
No study in the index tested Isgen on any of the ten; the 96.4% accuracy claim names no benchmark, size or date.
Read the Isgen card
27

Content Detector AI

Verdict
Fits readers who want the archived vendor list read against three outside results.
Value
6 named on the archived page: ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-4o, o1, Gemini and Claude (web.archive.org, 11 May 2026, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Readers comparing the GPT-4 claim with Walters 2023's 7% of 42 GPT-4 papers correct.
Main limitation
The live address redirects to a Moxby Mod; Walters 2023 scored the tool lowest of 16 overall and lowest on GPT-4 papers (Walters 2023).
Read the Content Detector AI card
38

AI Detector Pro

Verdict
Fits readers who want the three commercial families named, with GPT versions listed inside one item.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT (with GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3 and o4 inside the same FAQ item), Gemini and Claude (aidetector.pro/pages/faq, read 10 November 2026); the rule counts a family once.
Best for
Readers who want to know the vendor names the three families and no open-weight model.
Main limitation
No open-weight family is named; no study in the index tested AI Detector Pro.
Read the AI Detector Pro card
40

Decopy

Verdict
Fits readers who want the three commercial families named by a free tool.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini (decopy.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Readers who want the vendor's scope stated without a claim figure attached.
Main limitation
No study in the index tested Decopy and the vendor publishes no accuracy rate.
Read the Decopy card
41

Detecting-AI.com

Verdict
Fits readers who want the three families named by a tool with 300 free checks a day.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4o and earlier GPT models inside one item), Claude and Gemini (detecting-ai.com, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Readers checking text from the three large families without an account.
Main limitation
No study in the index tested Detecting-AI.com; the vendor's 99% (accuracy) claim carries no base.
Read the Detecting-AI.com card
43

Paperpal

Verdict
Fits researchers who want a vendor that states its training set as scholarly samples from three families.
Value
3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, with the page stating the detector is built on "100,000+ human and AI scholarly samples from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini" (paperpal.com/tools/ai-detector, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Manuscript checks on text from the three families.
Main limitation
No study in the index tested Paperpal; the 99% (accuracy) figure in the FAQ carries no base.
Read the Paperpal card
49

GPTKit

Verdict
Fits readers who want the narrowest scope statement in the index beside two outside results on that scope.
Value
1 named: ChatGPT, in "identify and classify text as either human- or chatgpt-generated" (gptkit.ai, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Readers checking ChatGPT text specifically, the text both records tested.
Main limitation
No other generator is claimed; Perkins 2024 recorded 4.5% accuracy on manipulated AI text, the lowest of seven (Perkins 2024).
Read the GPTKit card
12

Ircam Amplify

Verdict
Fits readers who want the only music detector list in the index with model versions named.
Value
11 named: ACE-Step, ElevenLabs Music (versions 1 and 2), Suno (versions 3 to 6), Lyria, Mureka, Riffusion, Treblo (formerly Sonauto) and Udio as the default coverage of AIMD V2.3, plus Boomy, LDM2 and MusicGen as legacy generators enabled by opt-in (docs.ircamamplify.io, model coverage, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Catalogue scans against Suno and Udio output, the two most named music generators.
Main limitation
The release note excludes the legacy three by default because they "contribute disproportionately to false-positive detections"; no study in the index tested AIMD.
Read the Ircam Amplify card
33

Monica

Verdict
Fits readers who want the four families named, with the vendor's headline count left as a claim.
Value
4 named: GPT (with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 inside the same list), Claude, Gemini and LLaMa; the page's "over 8 of the most advanced AI models" is printed and not counted (monica.im/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Readers checking text from the three commercial families and Llama inside the Monica assistant.
Main limitation
The page states the detector combines GPTZero, Copyleaks and ZeroGPT calls, so the coverage is theirs; no study in the index tested Monica.
Read the Monica card
34

Trinka

Verdict
Fits researchers who want the four families named by a tool built for academic text.
Value
4 named: ChatGPT and GPT-X as one family, Claude, Gemini and Gemini-X as one, and Llama-X (trinka.ai/features/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); "and other LLMs" adds no count.
Best for
Manuscript checks on text from the four named families.
Main limitation
The vendor's 99.9% rests on a self-submitted RAID leaderboard entry (26 May 2026), not a study record; no study in the index tested Trinka.
Read the Trinka card
45

Passed.ai

Verdict
Fits readers who want the vendor list of a product that ran on another vendor's engine.
Value
2 named: the GPT family (ChatGPT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and GPT-4 inside one FAQ answer) and GPT-J, EleutherAI's open model, counted once each (web.archive.org, 7 June 2026, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Readers tracing a Passed.ai score to the Originality.ai models it offered (Balanced 2.0 and Strict 3.0).
Main limitation
Every page of passed.ai served a closing notice on 10 November 2026; no study in the index tested Passed.ai itself.
Read the Passed.ai card
50

Writefull

Verdict
Fits readers of the two 2023 records who want the vendor's scope as it stood.
Value
1 named: GPT-3, GPT-4 and ChatGPT as one GPT family ("a text was written by GPT. This can be GPT-3, GPT-4, or ChatGPT") (web.archive.org, 31 December 2024, read 10 November 2026); the page promised GPT-4.5 and GPT-5 coverage that never came.
Best for
Readers reading a 2023 or 2024 Writefull percentage.
Main limitation
The tool is discontinued; Weber-Wulff 2023 left 18 of 36 AI documents undetected and Pegoraro 2023 printed a 21.6% true positive rate.
Read the Writefull card
52

Check For AI

Verdict
Fits readers who want the scope of a 2023 tool that built on OpenAI's public classifier.
Value
1 named: ChatGPT and GPT as one family, in "Help find ChatGPT generated essays" and "a hybrid implementation of Open AI's roberta-base detection model with our own proprietary AI" (web.archive.org, 27 May 2023, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Readers reading a March 2023 risk score.
Main limitation
The service was sunset in July 2023; Weber-Wulff 2023 ranked it 6th of 14 with 12 of 36 AI documents undetected.
Read the Check For AI card
55

Wordtune

Verdict
Fits readers who want the scope statement of a withdrawn tool, read from the archive.
Value
1 named: ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family, from the archived page title "Free AI Content Detector for GPT-4, ChatGPT & Other Tools" (web.archive.org, 30 March 2025, read 10 November 2026); "other tools" adds no count.
Best for
Readers tracing a 2023 or 2024 Wordtune percentage.
Main limitation
The page returned 404 on 10 November 2026; Kar 2024 scored one ChatGPT article and no human text.
Read the Wordtune card
56

ElevenLabs Classifier

Verdict
Fits readers who want the one card whose only named generator is its own vendor.
Value
1 named: ElevenLabs, the vendor's own voice models ("the probability that it was generated with ElevenLabs AI voice technology"); the FAQ states "It is not a general-purpose detector for every AI voice provider" and the Eleven v3 model is not reliably classified (elevenlabs.io/ai-speech-classifier, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Checking an ElevenLabs clip against the vendor that made it.
Main limitation
No outside generator is covered and no study in the index tested the classifier; the precision and recall figures are the vendor's own.
Read the ElevenLabs Classifier card
32

SEO.ai

Verdict
Fits readers who want a short named list on a free no-login tool.
Value
4 named: GPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family), Bard, Claude and Gemini (seo.ai/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none. Bard and Gemini are counted as two names because the page lists two.
Best for
Marketing copy from the four named families.
Main limitation
Walters 2023 tested GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 papers only and printed 12% of 42 human papers called AI (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).
Read the SEO.ai card
51

AI Writing Check

Verdict
Fits readers who want the one named target of a tool that no longer runs.
Value
1 named: ChatGPT, the only generator the archived page names; the withdrawal notice adds that the hosted algorithm was created by OpenAI (web.archive.org, 17 July 2023, aiwritingcheck.org, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Readers reading a 2023 verdict on a ChatGPT-era essay.
Main limitation
The tool was taken down in August 2023; Liang 2023's 61.22% is an average across seven detectors (arXiv 2304.02819v3, read 10 November 2026).
Read the AI Writing Check card
53

Grammica

Verdict
Fits readers who want the one named target of a free tool removed in 2026.
Value
1 named: GPT, as "Chat GPT 3" on the archived page, with "other AI models" unnamed (web.archive.org, 31 July 2025, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the name and not counted: "other AI models".
Best for
Readers reading a 2023 to 2025 Grammica percentage.
Main limitation
The detector was removed between 15 December 2025 and 12 January 2026; Walters 2023 printed 17% of 84 AI papers called human (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).
Read the Grammica card
54

IvyPanda

Verdict
Fits readers who want a free colour-coded check aimed at one generator family.
Value
1 named: GPT, as ChatGPT and GPT on the page, whose FAQ defines GPT as "the third generation of Generative Pre-trained Transformer developed by OpenAI" (ivypanda.com/tools/gpt-essay-checker, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the name and not counted: none.
Best for
A short essay checked free against the GPT family.
Main limitation
The page calls the tool a beta and prints no figure; Walters 2023 returned 23% of 126 documents as uncertain (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).
Read the IvyPanda card

How we ranked

Field sorted
Count of distinct generator models, families or products the vendor names as detected or trained against, each listed item once; a company counts once only where none of its models is named; catch-all phrases and headline counts ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators") are printed and not counted
Direction
Higher first
Tie rule
More study records first, then name
Qualification
A generators field that names at least one model; a card whose field names none is tabled apart
Qualified
56 of 72 detectors

Field sorted: the generator count field on each card, written on 9 November 2026 from the generators list that was read on 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day, each from the vendor page recorded on the card. A name counts once when the vendor lists it as a model, a model family or a product whose output the detector scores or was trained against: ChatGPT, GPT-4 and GPT-5 are three names because the vendor lists three; "DALL-E 2 and 3" is one name because the vendor lists one item with two versions; Turnitin's 35 are the 33 rows of its version table plus the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 generators its Spanish and Japanese models name. A company name counts once only where no model of that company is named on the same page (Proofademic's research page). Catch-all phrases ("other LLMs", "many others", "and more"), headline counts ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators", "26 models benchmarked", "about 90 further classes") and announced partners ("coming soon") are printed in the row and not counted. Direction: more names rank higher. Tie rule: more study records first, then product name, so Hive (2 records) sits above Sightengine (1) at 33, Copyleaks (9) above AI or Not (1) at 15, ZeroGPT (7) above Sapling (3) above Phrasly (0) at 11, GPTZero (16) above Originality.ai (7) above Winston AI (2) at 10. 56 of 72 qualify; 16 name no generator and are tabled apart. Full rules: methodology page. The count says how many names a vendor prints, never how many models a detector catches; the independently tested ranking and the GPT-4 question say which generators a study actually ran.

Why numbers differ between sources

A vendor can print a headline count, a named list, or both, and the two rarely agree. ZeroGPT names eleven models and states "35+ LLM families" (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); TruthScan names thirteen and states "500+ generators" for images (truthscan.com, read 9 November 2026); Pangram names sixteen and states "26 models benchmarked" (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); Resemble Detect names 62 and states "250+" (resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026). This page counts the names, because a name can be checked against a model that exists and a headline count cannot. Turnitin lists versions where other vendors list families, so its 35 rows cover fewer families than GPTZero's ten names (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026); the page counts what each vendor chose to print. Hive publishes class identifiers (sora2, gptimage1_5) in its documentation rather than marketing names, and the count follows the documentation (docs.thehive.ai, read 8 November 2026). Writer and BrandWell are counted from archived pages because the live pages redirect, read 9 November 2026. All read 8 and 9 November 2026; the Updated line is the date the page last changed.

Questions about the generators AI detectors name

Which AI detector names the most generator models?

Resemble Detect, with 62 named voice, image and video generators on its product page (resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026). Among text detectors, Turnitin names 35 model versions (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026).

Does naming a model mean the detector catches its output?

No. The count records what a vendor printed, read 8 and 9 November 2026; whether a detector catches a model's output is a question for a study, and the independently tested ranking lists the 21 cards with one. Turnitin names 35 versions and Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 of its fully AI papers under 20% (Van Vlasselaer 2026).

Which AI detectors name GPT-5 or GPT-6?

GPT-5: QuillBot, Pangram (GPT 5.6 and GPT-5.4), GPTZero, Copyleaks, Phrasly, Sapling, JustDone, ZeroGPT, Proofademic, Walter Writes, Turnitin (GPT-5 to GPT-5.4-pro), Undetectable AI, Smodin and Quetext, 14 cards; GPT-6: QuillBot, Grammarly, GPTZero, ZeroGPT and Originality.ai (GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol), 5 cards, per the generators field of each card read 8 and 9 November 2026. The ChatGPT coverage question reads the ChatGPT names.

Which AI detectors name Claude and Gemini?

Claude is named by 25 of the 36 cards with a list and Gemini by 26, per the generators fields read 8 and 9 November 2026 (Hive, SynthID and Resemble Detect name a Gemini image or watermark source, not the chat model); the seven that name neither are WasItAI, Sightengine, Illuminarty, DetectGPT, Writer and the two GPT-2 tools.

Why are catch-all phrases and headline counts left out?

Because they cannot be checked. "35+ LLM families" names no family and "500+ generators" no generator; a named model can be matched to a release and a date, a headline count cannot. The headline is printed in every row where a vendor states one, read 8 and 9 November 2026, so a reader can see the gap between the claim and the names.

Which cards name no generator at all?

Six: Reality Defender, Turnitin Clarity, Deepware, Sensity, Codeleaks and Pindrop Pulse, per the generators field of each card read 9 November 2026 and tabled above. Pindrop states "350+ deepfake generation tools" and "120 AI voice generation systems" as counts with no name. Five more joined the second table on 10 November 2026 with the eleventh wave: GPT Radar (GPT-3 named as the engine, not a target), RADAR and Ghostbuster (experiment models, not a coverage claim), Hiya Deepfake Detector and McAfee Deepfake Detector (unnamed voice generators), read that day.

Which of the ranked cards has a study record?

Twenty-one of the 36: GPTZero (16), GPT-2 Output Detector (12), Copyleaks (9), Originality.ai (7), ZeroGPT (7), Turnitin (5), Writer (5), Pangram (4), GLTR (4), DetectGPT (4), Sapling (3), BrandWell (3), QuillBot (2), Winston AI (2), Hive (2), Scribbr (1), Compilatio (1), Undetectable AI (1), AI or Not (1), Illuminarty (1) and Sightengine (1), per the independently tested ranking at index version 2026.11.13. None of the records tests a vendor's list name by name.

How often is this ranking updated?

The ranking was created on 9 November 2026 from generators fields read on 8 and 9 November 2026 and changes whenever a vendor page recorded on a card adds or drops a name. The next scheduled recheck of every card's fields is 8 December 2026 (methodology).

Sources and revisions

Sources

  1. Resemble Detect product pageresemble.ai/products/detect
  2. Turnitin AI writing detection FAQsguides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284...
  3. Hive AI image and video detection documentationdocs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d...
  4. Sightengine AI-generated image detectionsightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images
  5. Pangram home pagepangram.com
  6. Copyleaks AI Detectorcopyleaks.com/ai-content-detector
  7. AI or Not AI image detectoraiornot.com/ai-image-detector
  8. TruthScan AI detectortruthscan.com/ai-detector
  9. WasItAIwasitai.com
  10. ZeroGPTzerogpt.com
  11. Sapling AI Content Detectorsapling.ai/ai-content-detector
  12. Phrasly AI Detectorphrasly.ai/ai-detector
  13. GPTZero FAQgptzero.me/faq
  14. Originality.ai home pageoriginality.ai
  15. Winston AI product pagegowinston.ai/ai-content-detector
  16. Quetext AI Content Detectorquetext.com/ai-content-detector
  17. Proofademic home pageproofademic.ai
  18. SynthIDsynthid.com
  19. JustDone AI Detectorjustdone.com/ai-detector
  20. Codequiry AI code detectioncodequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code
  21. Scribbr AI Detectorscribbr.com/ai-detector
  22. DetectGPT paperarxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305
  23. Undetectable AI detectorundetectable.ai/ai-detector
  24. QuillBot AI Content Detectorquillbot.com/ai-content-detector
  25. Grammarly AI Detectorgrammarly.com/ai-detector
  26. Smodin AI Content Detectorsmodin.io/ai-content-detector
  27. BrandWell AI Content Detector (archived 9 August 2026)web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:...
  28. Walter Writes AI Detectorwalterwrites.ai/ai-detector
  29. Surfer AI Content Detectorsurfer.ai/ai-content-detector
  30. Grammarly Authorship support articlesupport.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2...
  31. AIDetectPlusaidetectplus.com/ai-detector
  32. Illuminarty image detectionilluminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag...
  33. Compilatio AI detector v4.6.2compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-...
  34. Writer AI Content Detector (archived 9 December 2025)web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:...
  35. GPT-2 Output Detector model cardhuggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b...
  36. GLTRgltr.io
  37. Reality Defender deepfake video detectionrealitydefender.com/deepfake-video-detection
  38. Deepware FAQdeepware.ai/us/faq/index.html
  39. Sensity deepfake detectionsensity.ai/deepfake-detection-for-video-i...
  40. Copyleaks Codeleaks launch releasecopyleaks.com/about-us/press-releases/cop...
  41. Pindrop Pulse Inspect launchpindrop.com/company-news/pindrop-launches...

Revision log

  1. Ranking created from the generator count field written at index version 2026
  2. Nine wave 9 cards added
  3. Twelve wave 10 cards added
  4. Nine wave 11 cards added

Corrections log

Related reading