AI detectors ranked by the generator models the vendor names
Resemble Detect names 62 generator models on its product page, 22 voice, 20 image and 20 video generators from ElevenLabs to HunyuanVideo, the most of any detector in the index, per resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026. Turnitin names 35 model versions in its AI writing detection FAQ (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026), and Hive and Sightengine 33 each, read 8 and 9 November 2026. Fifty-six of the 72 cards name at least one generator; sixteen name none (Ircam Amplify at 11, Monica and Trinka at 4, Passed.ai at 2 and Writefull, Check For AI, Wordtune and ElevenLabs at 1 joined on 10 November 2026, then SEO.ai at 4 and Grammica, IvyPanda and AI Writing Check at 1 with the eleventh wave; Writer was recounted from 2 to 1 the same day because ChatGPT and GPT-4 are one GPT family under the rule every wave since the ninth has applied). Every count on this page is a vendor's own list of what it says it detects or trained against, read from the page the card cites, and no indexed study tests a vendor's list name by name.
Updated Vendor pages read 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day
Short answer
The sort is the count of distinct generator models, families or products the vendor names, a description of 36 vendor lists and not a measure of what any detector catches: Resemble Detect 62, read 9 November 2026; Turnitin 35, read 8 November 2026; Hive 33 and Sightengine 33, read 8 and 9 November 2026, Hive first on study records; Pangram 16; Copyleaks 15 and AI or Not 15; TruthScan 13; WasItAI 12; ZeroGPT, Sapling and Phrasly 11 each; GPTZero, Originality.ai and Winston AI 10 each; down to GLTR and the GPT-2 Output Detector at one model each, GPT-2. A vendor list is a claim about coverage; where a vendor prints a headline count ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators", "250+ models") that exceeds its names, the headline is printed beside the count and not counted. No detector score should be the only evidence in a misconduct or hiring decision, whichever models the vendor names.
Which AI detectors name the most AI models they claim to detect?
| Rank | Detector | Generators named | The names, source and read date, and the vendor's claim figure | Study records | Best for | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resemble Detect | 62 named | 22 voice generators from ElevenLabs to HierSpeech++, 20 image generators from DALL-E 3 to Emu, 20 video generators from Sora to HunyuanVideo (resemble.ai/products/detect, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "250+ generative AI models" and "over 100 more" voice tools, unnamed | 0 | Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generators | Every figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect |
| 2 | Turnitin | 35 named | 35 named model versions, from Amazon Nova 2 Lite and Claude-3-Haiku to GPT-5.4-pro, Grok-4.1 and Mistral-large-3, plus the Spanish and Japanese model generators (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none; the FAQ lists versions rather than families | 5 | Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence covers | A version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20% |
| 3 | Hive | 33 named | 19 image and video source classes from sora and pika to gptimage1_5 and grok, 14 music attribution classes from duobao to ace_step; text: not published (docs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "about 90 further classes" for image and video, unnamed | 2 | Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one did | The text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies |
| 4 | Sightengine | 33 named | Nano Banana, GPT image, DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Imagen, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Grok Imagine, 13 further image generators from Seedream to Cosmos, StyleGAN, and 9 video generators from Sora to Midjourney Video (sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and others" for video, unnamed | 1 | Developers checking which image models a per-generator score covers | Image and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary |
| 5 | Pangram | 16 named | 16 models benchmarked by name, Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6, Gemini 3, Grok 4.3, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.4, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek V4, Llama 3.3, Mistral Medium 3.5, Kimi K2.6, Qwen 3.7 Max, Gemma 4, Nemotron 3 Ultra and GLM 5.2; six company names stand behind them (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "26 models benchmarked"; the home page names 16 | 4 | Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are named | The page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card |
| 6 | Copyleaks | 15 named | GPT-5, GPT-4, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama, Bloom, Rytr, Jasper for text; DALL-E, Imagen, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and Flux for images (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and more" | 9 | Institutions that want named coverage of the writing assistants Rytr and Jasper beside the LLMs | Nine records and none tests the named list; Orenstrakh 2023 flagged 10 of 10 Spanish human theses |
| 7 | AI or Not | 15 named | Nano Banana, Midjourney, DALL-E / GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Grok / Aurora, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Recraft, Seedream, Qwen and GAN models for images; ChatGPT, Claude and Meta LLaMa for text (aiornot.com/ai-image-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: image coverage "last updated July 2026" | 1 | Marketplaces screening product images from named generators | The text list is three names; the one record scored images under the Optic name with a 24.47% false positive rate |
| 8 | TruthScan | 13 named | ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, Bard, Jasper and Copy.ai for text; Nano Banana 2, Seedream 4.5, Imagen 4, Grok, Flux 2 Pro, GPT-Image 1.5 and Midjourney for images (truthscan.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "500+ generators" for images and "hundreds of other AI writing tools", unnamed | 0 | Teams checking images from the seven named 2026 generators | Thirteen names against a 500+ claim; no indexed study has scored TruthScan |
| 9 | WasItAI | 12 named | Midjourney, DALL-E, GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Flux, Imagen, Nano Banana, Grok, Bing Image Creator, StyleGAN, BigGAN (wasitai.com, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 0 | Buyers and editors checking a single image from a named generator | Images only; no indexed study has scored WasItAI |
| 10 | ZeroGPT | 11 named | Chat GPT, GPT 3, GPT 4, GPT 5, GPT 6, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity AI, Claude, DeepSeek and LLaMa models (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "35+ LLM families", unnamed beyond the eleven | 7 | Readers checking text from Perplexity or Grok output, which few cards name | Eleven names against a 35+ claim; 13 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023 |
| 11 | Sapling | 11 named | GPT-5, ChatGPT, the OpenAI GPT family, Claude 4.5, Claude 5.5, Gemini 2.5, Qwen3, DeepSeek-V3, Kimi, Llama and Mistral (sapling.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 3 | Teams checking Claude 5.5 or Qwen3 output through an API | Three records, none on the named list; 31% of human papers returned uncertain in Walters 2023 |
| 12 | Ircam Amplify | 11 named | ACE-Step, ElevenLabs Music (versions 1 and 2), Suno (versions 3 to 6), Lyria, Mureka, Riffusion, Treblo (formerly Sonauto), Udio, and the legacy opt-in Boomy, LDM2 and MusicGen (docs.ircamamplify.io, model coverage, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% (accuracy) | 0 | Labels checking tracks from the named music generators | The three legacy generators are excluded by default; every figure is the vendor's own; no study record |
| 13 | Phrasly | 11 named | ChatGPT (4o, 5 and 5.1), GPT-5, Claude, Google Gemini, Bard, Meta Llama, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, Jasper and Copy.ai (phrasly.ai/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and other AI writers" | 0 | Moderators scoring short posts from named chat models | The vendor sells a humanizer and no indexed study has tested its detector |
| 14 | GPTZero | 10 named | Claude, ChatGPT, GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5, GPT-6, Gemini, Llama, Deepseek and Grok (gptzero.me/faq, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "AI services based on those models" | 16 | Teachers who want GPT-6 and Grok named on the FAQ | Sixteen records, none on the named list; 9 of 18 false accusations in Weber-Wulff 2023 |
| 15 | Originality.ai | 10 named | GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3, Gemini 4 Argon, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, Grok 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick and Scout (originality.ai, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "and more" | 7 | Content teams checking drafts from the newest named GPT-6 and Gemini 4 variants | Seven records, none on the named list; 19 of 495 human passages flagged in Epoch AI 2026 |
| 16 | Winston AI | 10 named | ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini and LLaMA for text; Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Nano Banana, ChatGPT Image and Adobe Firefly for images (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "many others" for text | 2 | Schools checking both an essay and its illustrations | Four text names; neither record tests the named list |
| 17 | PlagiarismCheck | 10 named | ChatGPT, GPT-4o, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini Flash 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3, Llama 3 (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure: "the seven most recent AI models we tested" | 1 | Readers who want dated model versions named rather than families | Every version is the vendor's own list; the one record (2023) predates all of them |
| 18 | Isgen | 10 named | ChatGPT, GPT-6, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, LLaMa, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen (isgen.ai, read 9 November 2026) | 0 | Readers who want open-weight families (LLaMa, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen) named | No study record; the 96.4% claim names no benchmark |
| 19 | Proofademic | 9 named | ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude and Gemini on the detector page; Meta, Mistral, DeepSeek, Alibaba and xAI as companies on the research page (proofademic.ai/?utm_source=aidetectorinde..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other LLMs" | 0 | Academic users checking text from the companies named in the vendor's own test | Five of the nine are company names from a research page; no indexed study has scored Proofademic |
| 20 | Quetext | 9 named | ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Mistral on the current page; Bard, GPT-3 and GPT-4 on older page copy (quetext.com/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none; the older copy adds three retired names | 0 | Writers checking Mistral output, which few cards name | Three of the nine names come from older page copy; no indexed study has scored Quetext |
| 21 | Codequiry | 8 named | ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Claude, Grok, Google Gemini, Cursor AI, Amazon Q Developer and Meta Llama (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: a "General AI Detection model for any AI-generated code patterns" | 0 | Computer science departments checking Copilot, Cursor and Amazon Q output | Code only; no indexed study has scored Codequiry |
| 22 | JustDone | 8 named | ChatGPT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and DeepSeek (justdone.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "additional open-source and commercial LLMs" | 0 | Students on a Chrome extension who want GPT-3.5 to GPT-5 named | No indexed study has scored JustDone |
| 23 | SynthID | 8 named | Imagen, Veo, Lyria, Gemini and NotebookLM audio, watermarked at generation; NVIDIA Cosmos, OpenAI and Kakao as partners (synthid.com, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: Apple "coming soon", not counted | 0 | Newsrooms receiving Google, NVIDIA or partner output | A watermark list, not a detection list: unwatermarked output from the same models returns nothing |
| 24 | DetectGPT | 7 named | GPT-2 (1.5B), OPT-2.7B, GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J (6B), GPT-NeoX (20B), GPT-3 and Jurassic-2 Jumbo (175B), the models the paper evaluated (arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: any model whose token log probabilities can be read, white-box | 4 | Researchers running the method against an open model | A research method with no product page; the hosted demo is gone |
| 25 | Scribbr | 7 named | ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, GPT2, GPT3, GPT3.5 and GPT4 (scribbr.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: GPT4 "experimental in free tool; supported in Premium" | 1 | Students checking older GPT output | No GPT-5 or Claude named; the one record, Walters 2023, printed 1 of 42 false positives |
| 26 | Undetectable AI | 7 named | ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and Llama (undetectable.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other leading AI writing models" | 1 | Readers who want a free 10,000-word check against named models | The vendor sells a humanizer; the one record scored a single text |
| 27 | Content Detector AI | 6 named | ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-4o, o1, Gemini, Claude on the archived page of 11 May 2026 (web.archive.org, read 9 November 2026) | 3 | Readers who want the archived list of a tool three studies tested | The page redirected by 9 November 2026; 7% of 42 GPT-4 papers correct in Walters 2023 |
| 28 | QuillBot | 6 named | GPT-6, GPT-5, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Llama (quillbot.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other LLMs" | 2 | Students who want GPT-6 named on a free tool | The two records print scores on single texts, not rates |
| 29 | Grammarly | 6 named | ChatGPT, GPT-6, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot and Grammarly's own generative AI (grammarly.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other tools" | 0 | Grammarly users checking Copilot or Grammarly-assisted drafts | No indexed study has scored Grammarly's detector |
| 30 | Smodin | 6 named | ChatGPT and GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Copilot (smodin.io/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other popular AI language models" | 0 | Readers with a 50,000-character document | No indexed study has scored Smodin |
| 31 | BrandWell | 4 named | ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude Sonnet and Google Gemini (web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "various other language models" on an archived page | 3 | Readers of the three 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stood | The list is from an archived page of 9 August 2026; Weber-Wulff 2023 missed 36 of 36 AI documents |
| 32 | SEO.ai | 4 named | ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one GPT family, Bard, Claude, Gemini ("Detect AI-generated content from ChatGPT, GPT-4, Bard, Claude, and Gemini in any language", seo.ai/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 1 | Marketers checking copy from the four named families without a login | The one record tested papers from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 only; 12% of 42 human papers called AI |
| 33 | Monica | 4 named | GPT (GPT, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in one list), Claude, Gemini, LLaMa (monica.im/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: "over 8 of the most advanced AI models", 98% (detection accuracy) | 0 | Readers who want the four large families named by an assistant's built-in detector | The page's "over 8" is a claim figure, not a list; the detector calls three third-party engines; no study record |
| 34 | Trinka | 4 named | ChatGPT (GPT-X), Claude, Gemini (Gemini-X), Llama (Llama-X) (trinka.ai/features/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99.9% (accuracy) for academic text | 0 | Researchers who want the four families named by a manuscript tool | "and more" names nothing; the RAID leaderboard entry is self-submitted; no study record |
| 35 | Walter Writes | 4 named | ChatGPT (GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5), Claude, Gemini and Llama (walterwrites.ai/ai-detector/?utm_source=a..., read 8 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: Llama "API testing" | 0 | Teams on the Chrome extension checking GPT, Claude and Gemini drafts | Four names and no indexed study |
| 36 | Compilatio | 3 named | ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude; the v4.6.2 model was trained against 2026 versions of the three (compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other generative AI systems" | 1 | European institutions asking which model versions the 2026 release was trained on | Three names; the one record tested the 2023 free tool |
| 37 | Illuminarty | 3 named | Dalle2, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, from the release post's validation table (illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: the generator count "will gradually increase" | 1 | Readers of Ha and Passananti 2024 who want the vendor's own list | Three 2023 names; Ha and Passananti 2024 recorded a 67.40% false positive rate on human artworks |
| 38 | AI Detector Pro | 3 named | ChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3 and o4 named inside one FAQ item), Gemini, Claude (aidetector.pro/pages/faq, read 10 November 2026) | 0 | Readers who want the three large families named | Version variants inside one item are not added; no study record |
| 39 | AIDetectPlus | 3 named | ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude (aidetectplus.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "any GPT-family model" | 0 | Students on a one-time 1,000-credit free allowance | Three names; no indexed study has scored AIDetectPlus |
| 40 | Decopy | 3 named | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini (decopy.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026) | 0 | Readers who want the three large families named free | No study record; no accuracy rate published |
| 41 | Detecting-AI.com | 3 named | ChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4o and earlier GPT models), Claude, Gemini (detecting-ai.com, read 10 November 2026) | 0 | Readers who want the three families named by a no-account tool | No study record; the 99% claim has no base |
| 42 | Grammarly Authorship | 3 named | ChatGPT, Claude and Grammarly's own generative AI, attributed from the clipboard (support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "any other generative AI site where the browser extension runs" | 0 | Writing instructors who want sources attributed rather than text classified | Attribution needs the extension running at paste time; a new AI tool may not yet be categorised |
| 43 | Paperpal | 3 named | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude; "100,000+ human and AI scholarly samples from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini" (paperpal.com/tools/ai-detector, read 10 November 2026) | 0 | Researchers who want the training scope stated as scholarly text | No study record; the 99% claim is the vendor's own |
| 44 | Surfer | 3 named | ChatGPT, Claude and Google Gemini (surfer.ai/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other AI content generators, including content altered by writing tools or AI rewriters" | 0 | Content teams inside Surfer | Three names; no indexed study has scored Surfer |
| 45 | Passed.ai | 2 named | GPT (ChatGPT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and GPT-4 in one FAQ item), GPT-J (web.archive.org, 7 June 2026, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% (accurate) on GPT-4, attributed to Originality.ai's engine | 0 | Teachers reading what the closing product claimed to cover | The list is Originality.ai's engine's; the service is closing; no study record |
| 46 | GPT-2 Output Detector | 1 named | GPT-2, the 1.5B model whose output the RoBERTa classifier was fine-tuned on (huggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: the model card says not to use it as a ChatGPT detector | 12 | Researchers who want a 2019 baseline against 2023 to 2025 tools | One model from 2019; 0.9503 of 1,992 human passages flagged in Jabarian and Imas 2025 |
| 47 | Writer | 1 named | GPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family, recounted 10 November 2026 under the sitewide rule), from the archived page of 9 December 2025 (web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:..., read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 5 | Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimed | The tool was withdrawn on 22 December 2025; 19 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023 |
| 48 | GLTR | 1 named | GPT-2, the 117M model behind the public demo and the 1.5B model in the paper (gltr.io, read 9 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: BERT as an alternative backend, not a generator | 4 | Readers of the four records that ran GLTR | One model; 100% of human documents flagged at the loosest RAID threshold |
| 49 | GPTKit | 1 named | ChatGPT, the only generator the home page names (gptkit.ai, read 9 November 2026) | 2 | Readers who want a scope statement limited to ChatGPT | Two records, 2023 and 2024, both on ChatGPT text; nothing newer is claimed |
| 50 | Writefull | 1 named | GPT (GPT-3, GPT-4 and ChatGPT in one family) (web.archive.org, 31 December 2024, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: none | 2 | Readers checking what the discontinued tool claimed | Discontinued before 7 March 2025; 18 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023 |
| 51 | AI Writing Check | 1 named | ChatGPT ("to enable educators to check if a piece of writing submitted by a student was written by the AI tool ChatGPT", web.archive.org, 17 July 2023, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 1 | Readers tracing what the withdrawn nonprofit tool targeted | Withdrawn since August 2023; the one record prints an averaged rate |
| 52 | Check For AI | 1 named | GPT (ChatGPT and GPT in one family) (web.archive.org, 27 May 2023, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: none for the product (95% attributed to OpenAI's RoBERTa model) | 1 | Readers checking what the sunset tool claimed | Sunset in July 2023; the engine was OpenAI's RoBERTa model plus the vendor's own |
| 53 | Grammica | 1 named | GPT ("identify AI-written text from Chat GPT 3 and other AI models", web.archive.org, 31 July 2025, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: "other AI models", unnamed | 1 | Readers tracing what the withdrawn free tool targeted | Removed in the January 2026 relaunch; 17% of 84 AI papers called human in the one record |
| 54 | IvyPanda | 1 named | GPT ("It is up to you to decide if the text is Chat GPT generated or not"; the FAQ defines GPT, ivypanda.com/tools/gpt-essay-checker, read 10 November 2026); claim figure or catch-all: none | 1 | Students checking a ChatGPT-era essay in a free colour map | A beta with no figure; 23% of 126 documents uncertain in the one record |
| 55 | Wordtune | 1 named | GPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 in the page title) (web.archive.org, 30 March 2025, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: over 99% (accuracy rate) | 1 | Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimed | The page has returned 404 since July 2025; the one record scored one text |
| 56 | ElevenLabs Classifier | 1 named | ElevenLabs, the vendor's own models; Eleven v3 is stated as not reliably classified (elevenlabs.io/ai-speech-classifier, read 10 November 2026); claim figure: 99% precision, 80% recall | 0 | Readers checking whether a clip came from ElevenLabs | A self-detector: audio from other providers is stated as not detected; no study record |
Cards that name no generator
| Detector | What the generators field states | Source, read date |
|---|---|---|
| Reality Defender | "Not named by generator": the vendor lists manipulation types (face swaps, generated video, altered faces, synthetic speech, AI-agent callers) | realitydefender.com/deepfake-video-detection, read 9 November 2026 |
| Turnitin Clarity | No generators field: Clarity records the writing process and shows AI writing results through the Originality add-on | guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/376..., read 9 November 2026 |
| Deepware | Face manipulation deepfakes only; the FAQ states the scanner does not detect voice, images or text | deepware.ai/us/faq/index.html, read 9 November 2026 |
| Sensity | Manipulation and content types (face swap, lip sync, GAN faces, text-to-image, voice cloning); a Model Generator attribution with no published list | sensity.ai/deepfake-detection-for-video-i..., read 9 November 2026 |
| Codeleaks | No generator list for code; the launch release names ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot as sources of AI code, not as detection coverage | copyleaks.com/about-us/press-releases/cop..., read 9 November 2026 |
| Pindrop Pulse | "350+ deepfake generation tools", "120 AI voice generation systems" and "32 engines" as counts, none named | pindrop.com/company-news/pindrop-launches..., read 9 November 2026 |
| Binoculars | The paper's experiment generators (ChatGPT, LLaMA-2, Falcon-7B, the M4 models) describe what was tested, not a vendor coverage claim; no product list exists | github.com/ahans30/Binoculars, read 10 November 2026 |
| StealthWriter | The detector page names no generator; the FAQ's model list answers "What kind of AI text can it humanize?" and is quoted, not counted | stealthwriter.ai/faq, read 10 November 2026 |
| FakeCatcher | No generator list; the newsroom post describes deepfakes of real people and the paper names evaluation datasets | intel.com newsroom, 14 November 2022, read 10 November 2026 |
| Deepfake-O-Meter | No single platform list; each hosted detector states its own scope (ProGAN to DALL-E for CLIP-ViT, FaceForensics++ manipulations for AltFreezing, ASVspoof for AASIST) | detectors endpoint, read 10 November 2026 |
| GPT Radar | The page names GPT-3 as the engine ("We use OpenAI GPT-3 to analyze a piece of text") and no model as a target | web.archive.org, 12 July 2026, read 10 November 2026 |
| RADAR | The paper's eight target LLMs (Vicuna-7B as the released detector's training target, Pythia-2.8B to LLaMA-7B) and a GPT-4 transfer test describe what was tested, not a vendor coverage claim | huggingface.co/TrustSafeAI/RADAR-Vicuna-7B, read 10 November 2026 |
| Ghostbuster | ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo) for the three released datasets and Claude in a generalisation test describe the experiments, not a coverage claim | github.com/vivek3141/ghostbuster, read 10 November 2026 |
| Hiya Deepfake Detector | "Detects voices created by all popular voice synthesis tools", unnamed | Chrome Web Store listing, read 10 November 2026 |
| McAfee Deepfake Detector | "AI-generated audio" from models "trained on close to 200,000 samples", no generator named | mcafee.com newsroom, 21 August 2024, read 10 November 2026 |
One of the plan rankings in the rankings hub, beside languages, which counts the languages a vendor states, and claim vs evidence gap, which sets accuracy claims beside study results. The ChatGPT coverage question reads one name across the cards; this page counts all of them. The home board answers which AI detectors name the models they detect?
Which AI detectors should you check first?
- Resemble Detect, rank 1Best for: Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generators. Main limitation: Every figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect.
- Turnitin, rank 2Best for: Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence covers. Main limitation: A version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20%.
- Hive, rank 3Best for: Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one did. Main limitation: The text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies.
- Sightengine, rank 4Best for: Developers checking which image models a per-generator score covers. Main limitation: Image and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary.
- Pangram, rank 5Best for: Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are named. Main limitation: The page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card.
What does each vendor name, tool by tool?

Resemble Detect
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the longest vendor list in the index, on media rather than text.
- Value
- 62 named: ElevenLabs, OpenAI TTS, Azure TTS, Google TTS, AWS Polly, Suno, Udio, PlayHT, Murf, Descript Overdub, Bark, VALL-E, VALL-E 2, YourTTS, Tortoise TTS, XTTS, StyleTTS 2, MetaVoice, Kokoro, VoiceBox, NaturalSpeech 3, HierSpeech++, DALL-E 3, Midjourney v6 and v7, Stable Diffusion SDXL and SD 3.5, Nano Banana, Flux v2, Gemini Imagen 3 and 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o image generation, StyleGAN v2 and v3, Ideogram v2 and v3, Leonardo AI, Latent Diffusion, eDiff-I, GLIDE, Kandinsky, DeepFloyd IF, Playground v3, Grok Aurora, Recraft v3, Lumina Image, Emu (Meta), Sora, Veo, Runway Gen-3 Alpha and Gen-2, HeyGen, Pika, Kling, Seedance, Synthesia, D-ID, CogVideoX, Wan 2.1, Open-Sora, ModelScope, VideoCrafter, AnimateDiff, VideoPoet, Make-A-Video, Morph Studio, Mochi 1, HunyuanVideo (resemble.ai/products/detect, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "250+ generative AI models" and "over 100 more" voice tools, unnamed.
- Best for
- Teams checking voice, image and video from named commercial generators
- Main limitation
- Every figure beside a name is the vendor's own; no indexed study has scored Resemble Detect

Turnitin
- Verdict
- Fits institutions that want to see which model versions a vendor says it trained against.
- Value
- 35 named: Amazon Nova 2 Lite, Claude-3-Haiku, Claude Sonnet-3.5, Claude Sonnet-3.7, Claude-Haiku-4.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, DeepSeek V3.2, Gemini-1.0-pro, Gemini-1.5-pro, Gemini-2.0-flash, Gemini-2.5-flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini-3-flash-preview, Gemini-3-pro-preview, Gemini-3.1-pro-preview, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano, GPT-5.1, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.2 Pro, GPT-5.3, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4-pro, o1-mini, Grok-4.1, Llama-3.3-70b, Llama-4-Maverick-17b, Mistral-large-3, GPT-3.5 (Spanish model), GPT-4 (Spanish and Japanese models) (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none; the FAQ lists versions rather than families.
- Best for
- Administrators who must answer which GPT-5 or Gemini 3 variants the licence covers
- Main limitation
- A version list is a training claim; Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 fully AI papers under 20%

Hive
- Verdict
- Fits moderation teams that want per-generator attribution on images, video and music.
- Value
- 33 named: sora, pika, kling, luma, runway, flux, dalle, stablediffusion, midjourney, imagen, adobefirefly, bingimagecreator, ideogram, gemini, veo3, imagen4, sora2, gptimage1_5, grok, duobao, google (music), heartmula, loudly, minimax, mubert, mureka, musicgen, riffusion, stable_audio_open, suno, udio, yue, ace_step (docs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "about 90 further classes" for image and video, unnamed.
- Best for
- Platforms that need to know which generator made a file, not only whether one did
- Main limitation
- The text detector publishes a single class and no generator list; the two records are image studies

Sightengine
- Verdict
- Fits image and video API customers who want a dated, named generator list.
- Value
- 33 named: Nano Banana, GPT image generation, DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Imagen, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Grok Imagine, Seedream, Reve, Recraft, Krea, Qwen, HiDream, Higgsfield, Hunyuan, Kling, MAI-Image, Vidu, Z-image, Cosmos, StyleGAN2 and StyleGAN3, Sora, Veo, Runway Gen-2 to Gen-4, Pika, Hailuo, Seedance, Wan, LTX, Midjourney Video (sightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and others" for video, unnamed.
- Best for
- Developers checking which image models a per-generator score covers
- Main limitation
- Image and video only; the one record is 50 adversarial images, labelled preliminary

Pangram
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a model list that names 2026 frontier models and open weights alike.
- Value
- 16 named: Claude Opus 5, GPT 5.6, Gemini 3, Grok 4.3, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.4, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek V4, Llama 3.3, Mistral Medium 3.5, Kimi K2.6, Qwen 3.7 Max, Gemma 4, Nemotron 3 Ultra, GLM 5.2 (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "26 models benchmarked"; the home page names 16.
- Best for
- Teams asking whether open-weight models such as Qwen, Gemma and GLM are named
- Main limitation
- The page states 26 benchmarked and names 16; the benchmark results sit on the vendor's own model card

Copyleaks
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want text and image generator lists from one vendor with nine study records.
- Value
- 15 named: GPT-5, GPT-4, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama (Meta), Bloom, Rytr, Jasper, DALL-E, Imagen, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Flux (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and more".
- Best for
- Institutions that want named coverage of the writing assistants Rytr and Jasper beside the LLMs
- Main limitation
- Nine records and none tests the named list; Orenstrakh 2023 flagged 10 of 10 Spanish human theses

AI or Not
- Verdict
- Fits image checkers who want a dated list of 2026 generators.
- Value
- 15 named: Nano Banana, Midjourney, DALL-E / GPT Image, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Grok / Aurora, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, Recraft, Seedream, Qwen, StyleGAN and GAN models, ChatGPT (text), Claude (text), Meta LLaMa (text) (aiornot.com/ai-image-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: image coverage "last updated July 2026".
- Best for
- Marketplaces screening product images from named generators
- Main limitation
- The text list is three names; the one record scored images under the Optic name with a 24.47% false positive rate

TruthScan
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want to see how far a vendor's named list sits below its headline figure.
- Value
- 13 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, Bard, Jasper, Copy.ai, Nano Banana 2, Seedream 4.5, Imagen 4, Grok, Flux 2 Pro, GPT-Image 1.5, Midjourney (truthscan.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "500+ generators" for images and "hundreds of other AI writing tools", unnamed.
- Best for
- Teams checking images from the seven named 2026 generators
- Main limitation
- Thirteen names against a 500+ claim; no indexed study has scored TruthScan

WasItAI
- Verdict
- Fits readers checking images from the twelve named generators.
- Value
- 12 named: Midjourney, DALL-E, GPT Image (OpenAI), Stable Diffusion, Adobe Firefly, Flux, Imagen (Google), Nano Banana, Grok, Bing Image Creator, StyleGAN, BigGAN (wasitai.com, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none.
- Best for
- Buyers and editors checking a single image from a named generator
- Main limitation
- Images only; no indexed study has scored WasItAI

ZeroGPT
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a free text tool with a broad named list and seven study records.
- Value
- 11 named: Chat GPT, GPT 3, GPT 4, GPT 5, GPT 6, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity AI, Claude, DeepSeek, LLaMa models (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "35+ LLM families", unnamed beyond the eleven.
- Best for
- Readers checking text from Perplexity or Grok output, which few cards name
- Main limitation
- Eleven names against a 35+ claim; 13 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023

Sapling
- Verdict
- Fits developers who want model versions named on the detector page itself.
- Value
- 11 named: GPT-5, ChatGPT, OpenAI GPT family, Claude 4.5, Claude 5.5, Gemini 2.5, Qwen3, DeepSeek-V3, Kimi, Llama, Mistral (sapling.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none.
- Best for
- Teams checking Claude 5.5 or Qwen3 output through an API
- Main limitation
- Three records, none on the named list; 31% of human papers returned uncertain in Walters 2023

Phrasly
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a list that names writing assistants beside the chat models.
- Value
- 11 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Google Gemini, Bard, Meta Llama, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Grok, Jasper, Copy.ai (phrasly.ai/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and other AI writers".
- Best for
- Moderators scoring short posts from named chat models
- Main limitation
- The vendor sells a humanizer and no indexed study has tested its detector

GPTZero
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the card with the most study records and a ten-name list.
- Value
- 10 named: Claude, ChatGPT, GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5, GPT-6, Gemini, Llama, Deepseek, Grok (gptzero.me/faq, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "AI services based on those models".
- Best for
- Teachers who want GPT-6 and Grok named on the FAQ
- Main limitation
- Sixteen records, none on the named list; 9 of 18 false accusations in Weber-Wulff 2023

Originality.ai
- Verdict
- Fits publishers who want 2026 model versions named on the home page.
- Value
- 10 named: GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3, Gemini 4 Argon, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, Grok 4.7, Llama 4 Maverick and Scout (originality.ai, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "and more".
- Best for
- Content teams checking drafts from the newest named GPT-6 and Gemini 4 variants
- Main limitation
- Seven records, none on the named list; 19 of 495 human passages flagged in Epoch AI 2026

Winston AI
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want text and image lists from a card with two records.
- Value
- 10 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, LLaMA, Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Nano Banana, ChatGPT Image, Adobe Firefly (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "many others" for text.
- Best for
- Schools checking both an essay and its illustrations
- Main limitation
- Four text names; neither record tests the named list

Proofademic
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the research page's eight-company test set beside the detector list.
- Value
- 9 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Meta (research page), Mistral (research page), DeepSeek (research page), Alibaba (research page), xAI (research page) (proofademic.ai/?utm_source=aidetectorinde..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other LLMs".
- Best for
- Academic users checking text from the companies named in the vendor's own test
- Main limitation
- Five of the nine are company names from a research page; no indexed study has scored Proofademic

Quetext
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want to see how a list ages across page versions.
- Value
- 9 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, Bard, GPT-3, GPT-4 (quetext.com/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none; the older copy adds three retired names.
- Best for
- Writers checking Mistral output, which few cards name
- Main limitation
- Three of the nine names come from older page copy; no indexed study has scored Quetext

Codequiry
- Verdict
- Fits instructors who want coding assistants named, not only chat models.
- Value
- 8 named: ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Claude, Grok, Google Gemini, Cursor AI, Amazon Q Developer (CodeWhisperer), Meta Llama (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: a "General AI Detection model for any AI-generated code patterns".
- Best for
- Computer science departments checking Copilot, Cursor and Amazon Q output
- Main limitation
- Code only; no indexed study has scored Codequiry

JustDone
- Verdict
- Fits readers checking text from the eight named chat models.
- Value
- 8 named: ChatGPT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek (justdone.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "additional open-source and commercial LLMs".
- Best for
- Students on a Chrome extension who want GPT-3.5 to GPT-5 named
- Main limitation
- No indexed study has scored JustDone

SynthID
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want to know whose output carries a SynthID watermark.
- Value
- 8 named: Imagen, Veo, Lyria, Gemini, NotebookLM audio, NVIDIA Cosmos, OpenAI (partner), Kakao (partner) (synthid.com, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: Apple "coming soon", not counted.
- Best for
- Newsrooms receiving Google, NVIDIA or partner output
- Main limitation
- A watermark list, not a detection list: unwatermarked output from the same models returns nothing
DetectGPT
- Verdict
- Fits researchers who want the paper's evaluation set rather than a product claim.
- Value
- 7 named: GPT-2 (1.5B), OPT-2.7B, GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J (6B), GPT-NeoX (20B), GPT-3, Jurassic-2 Jumbo (175B) (arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: any model whose token log probabilities can be read, white-box.
- Best for
- Researchers running the method against an open model
- Main limitation
- A research method with no product page; the hosted demo is gone

Scribbr
- Verdict
- Fits students who want GPT-2 to GPT-4 named on a free tool.
- Value
- 7 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, GPT2, GPT3, GPT3.5, GPT4 (scribbr.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: GPT4 "experimental in free tool; supported in Premium".
- Best for
- Students checking older GPT output
- Main limitation
- No GPT-5 or Claude named; the one record, Walters 2023, printed 1 of 42 false positives

Undetectable AI
- Verdict
- Fits readers checking text from the seven named chat models on a free tool.
- Value
- 7 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama (undetectable.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other leading AI writing models".
- Best for
- Readers who want a free 10,000-word check against named models
- Main limitation
- The vendor sells a humanizer; the one record scored a single text

QuillBot
- Verdict
- Fits students inside the QuillBot suite checking text from six named models.
- Value
- 6 named: GPT-6, GPT-5, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Llama (quillbot.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other LLMs".
- Best for
- Students who want GPT-6 named on a free tool
- Main limitation
- The two records print scores on single texts, not rates

Grammarly
- Verdict
- Fits writers who want a vendor that names its own generator among the six.
- Value
- 6 named: ChatGPT, GPT-6, Gemini, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Grammarly (grammarly.com/ai-detector, read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other tools".
- Best for
- Grammarly users checking Copilot or Grammarly-assisted drafts
- Main limitation
- No indexed study has scored Grammarly's detector

Smodin
- Verdict
- Fits readers checking long text free against six named models.
- Value
- 6 named: ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Copilot (smodin.io/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other popular AI language models".
- Best for
- Readers with a 50,000-character document
- Main limitation
- No indexed study has scored Smodin

BrandWell
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the list from a page that has since redirected.
- Value
- 4 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude Sonnet, Google Gemini (web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "various other language models" on an archived page.
- Best for
- Readers of the three 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stood
- Main limitation
- The list is from an archived page of 9 August 2026; Weber-Wulff 2023 missed 36 of 36 AI documents

Walter Writes
- Verdict
- Fits teams checking text from the four named families.
- Value
- 4 named: ChatGPT (GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-5), Claude, Gemini, Llama (walterwrites.ai/ai-detector/?utm_source=a..., read 8 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: Llama "API testing".
- Best for
- Teams on the Chrome extension checking GPT, Claude and Gemini drafts
- Main limitation
- Four names and no indexed study

Compilatio
- Verdict
- Fits institutions that want the training generation stated beside the names.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude (compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other generative AI systems".
- Best for
- European institutions asking which model versions the 2026 release was trained on
- Main limitation
- Three names; the one record tested the 2023 free tool

Illuminarty
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want to see the 2023 validation set behind an image detector.
- Value
- 3 named: Dalle2, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion (illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: the generator count "will gradually increase".
- Best for
- Readers of Ha and Passananti 2024 who want the vendor's own list
- Main limitation
- Three 2023 names; Ha and Passananti 2024 recorded a 67.40% false positive rate on human artworks

AIDetectPlus
- Verdict
- Fits readers checking text from the three named models.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude (aidetectplus.com/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "any GPT-family model".
- Best for
- Students on a one-time 1,000-credit free allowance
- Main limitation
- Three names; no indexed study has scored AIDetectPlus

Grammarly Authorship
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a process record of which AI site text was pasted from.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Grammarly's own generative AI (support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "any other generative AI site where the browser extension runs".
- Best for
- Writing instructors who want sources attributed rather than text classified
- Main limitation
- Attribution needs the extension running at paste time; a new AI tool may not yet be categorised

Surfer
- Verdict
- Fits SEO teams checking drafts from the three named models.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini (surfer.ai/ai-content-detector, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: "other AI content generators, including content altered by writing tools or AI rewriters".
- Best for
- Content teams inside Surfer
- Main limitation
- Three names; no indexed study has scored Surfer

Writer
- Verdict
- Fits readers of the five 2023 records who want the vendor's list as it stood.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT, with ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family (web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none. Recounted from 2 on 10 November 2026: the sitewide rule counts the GPT family once, as it does for Wordtune, Writefull and Check For AI, which name the same pair.
- Best for
- Readers checking what the withdrawn tool claimed
- Main limitation
- The tool was withdrawn on 22 December 2025; 19 of 36 AI documents undetected in Weber-Wulff 2023

GPT-2 Output Detector
- Verdict
- Fits researchers who want the baseline twelve studies ran.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT-2 (huggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b..., read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: the model card says not to use it as a ChatGPT detector.
- Best for
- Researchers who want a 2019 baseline against 2023 to 2025 tools
- Main limitation
- One model from 2019; 0.9503 of 1,992 human passages flagged in Jabarian and Imas 2025

GLTR
- Verdict
- Fits researchers who want the 2019 visual tool's own scope.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT-2 (gltr.io, read 9 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: BERT as an alternative backend, not a generator.
- Best for
- Readers of the four records that ran GLTR
- Main limitation
- One model; 100% of human documents flagged at the loosest RAID threshold

PlagiarismCheck
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a vendor list with model versions rather than family names.
- Value
- 10 named: ChatGPT, GPT-4o, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini Flash 3.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3 and Llama 3, with the benchmark post describing "the seven most recent AI models we tested" (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers who want to see which 2026 models a vendor says it tested.
- Main limitation
- The list and the 99,23% beside it are the vendor's own; the one indexed record, Weber-Wulff 2023, tested GPT-3.5 text in May 2023 and ranked the tool 13th of 14.

Isgen
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the open-weight families named beside the three commercial ones.
- Value
- 10 named: ChatGPT, GPT-6, Claude, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, LLaMa, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek and Qwen (isgen.ai, read 9 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers checking text from a DeepSeek or Qwen model, which few vendor lists name.
- Main limitation
- No study in the index tested Isgen on any of the ten; the 96.4% accuracy claim names no benchmark, size or date.

Content Detector AI
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the archived vendor list read against three outside results.
- Value
- 6 named on the archived page: ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-4o, o1, Gemini and Claude (web.archive.org, 11 May 2026, read 9 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers comparing the GPT-4 claim with Walters 2023's 7% of 42 GPT-4 papers correct.
- Main limitation
- The live address redirects to a Moxby Mod; Walters 2023 scored the tool lowest of 16 overall and lowest on GPT-4 papers (Walters 2023).

AI Detector Pro
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the three commercial families named, with GPT versions listed inside one item.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT (with GPT-5, GPT-4, o1, o3 and o4 inside the same FAQ item), Gemini and Claude (aidetector.pro/pages/faq, read 10 November 2026); the rule counts a family once.
- Best for
- Readers who want to know the vendor names the three families and no open-weight model.
- Main limitation
- No open-weight family is named; no study in the index tested AI Detector Pro.

Decopy
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the three commercial families named by a free tool.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini (decopy.ai/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers who want the vendor's scope stated without a claim figure attached.
- Main limitation
- No study in the index tested Decopy and the vendor publishes no accuracy rate.

Detecting-AI.com
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the three families named by a tool with 300 free checks a day.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT (GPT-5, GPT-4o and earlier GPT models inside one item), Claude and Gemini (detecting-ai.com, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers checking text from the three large families without an account.
- Main limitation
- No study in the index tested Detecting-AI.com; the vendor's 99% (accuracy) claim carries no base.

Paperpal
- Verdict
- Fits researchers who want a vendor that states its training set as scholarly samples from three families.
- Value
- 3 named: ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, with the page stating the detector is built on "100,000+ human and AI scholarly samples from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini" (paperpal.com/tools/ai-detector, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Manuscript checks on text from the three families.
- Main limitation
- No study in the index tested Paperpal; the 99% (accuracy) figure in the FAQ carries no base.

GPTKit
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the narrowest scope statement in the index beside two outside results on that scope.
- Value
- 1 named: ChatGPT, in "identify and classify text as either human- or chatgpt-generated" (gptkit.ai, read 9 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers checking ChatGPT text specifically, the text both records tested.
- Main limitation
- No other generator is claimed; Perkins 2024 recorded 4.5% accuracy on manipulated AI text, the lowest of seven (Perkins 2024).

Ircam Amplify
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the only music detector list in the index with model versions named.
- Value
- 11 named: ACE-Step, ElevenLabs Music (versions 1 and 2), Suno (versions 3 to 6), Lyria, Mureka, Riffusion, Treblo (formerly Sonauto) and Udio as the default coverage of AIMD V2.3, plus Boomy, LDM2 and MusicGen as legacy generators enabled by opt-in (docs.ircamamplify.io, model coverage, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Catalogue scans against Suno and Udio output, the two most named music generators.
- Main limitation
- The release note excludes the legacy three by default because they "contribute disproportionately to false-positive detections"; no study in the index tested AIMD.

Monica
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the four families named, with the vendor's headline count left as a claim.
- Value
- 4 named: GPT (with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 inside the same list), Claude, Gemini and LLaMa; the page's "over 8 of the most advanced AI models" is printed and not counted (monica.im/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers checking text from the three commercial families and Llama inside the Monica assistant.
- Main limitation
- The page states the detector combines GPTZero, Copyleaks and ZeroGPT calls, so the coverage is theirs; no study in the index tested Monica.

Trinka
- Verdict
- Fits researchers who want the four families named by a tool built for academic text.
- Value
- 4 named: ChatGPT and GPT-X as one family, Claude, Gemini and Gemini-X as one, and Llama-X (trinka.ai/features/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); "and other LLMs" adds no count.
- Best for
- Manuscript checks on text from the four named families.
- Main limitation
- The vendor's 99.9% rests on a self-submitted RAID leaderboard entry (26 May 2026), not a study record; no study in the index tested Trinka.

Passed.ai
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the vendor list of a product that ran on another vendor's engine.
- Value
- 2 named: the GPT family (ChatGPT, GPT-2, GPT-3 and GPT-4 inside one FAQ answer) and GPT-J, EleutherAI's open model, counted once each (web.archive.org, 7 June 2026, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers tracing a Passed.ai score to the Originality.ai models it offered (Balanced 2.0 and Strict 3.0).
- Main limitation
- Every page of passed.ai served a closing notice on 10 November 2026; no study in the index tested Passed.ai itself.

Writefull
- Verdict
- Fits readers of the two 2023 records who want the vendor's scope as it stood.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT-3, GPT-4 and ChatGPT as one GPT family ("a text was written by GPT. This can be GPT-3, GPT-4, or ChatGPT") (web.archive.org, 31 December 2024, read 10 November 2026); the page promised GPT-4.5 and GPT-5 coverage that never came.
- Best for
- Readers reading a 2023 or 2024 Writefull percentage.
- Main limitation
- The tool is discontinued; Weber-Wulff 2023 left 18 of 36 AI documents undetected and Pegoraro 2023 printed a 21.6% true positive rate.

Check For AI
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the scope of a 2023 tool that built on OpenAI's public classifier.
- Value
- 1 named: ChatGPT and GPT as one family, in "Help find ChatGPT generated essays" and "a hybrid implementation of Open AI's roberta-base detection model with our own proprietary AI" (web.archive.org, 27 May 2023, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers reading a March 2023 risk score.
- Main limitation
- The service was sunset in July 2023; Weber-Wulff 2023 ranked it 6th of 14 with 12 of 36 AI documents undetected.

Wordtune
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the scope statement of a withdrawn tool, read from the archive.
- Value
- 1 named: ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family, from the archived page title "Free AI Content Detector for GPT-4, ChatGPT & Other Tools" (web.archive.org, 30 March 2025, read 10 November 2026); "other tools" adds no count.
- Best for
- Readers tracing a 2023 or 2024 Wordtune percentage.
- Main limitation
- The page returned 404 on 10 November 2026; Kar 2024 scored one ChatGPT article and no human text.

ElevenLabs Classifier
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the one card whose only named generator is its own vendor.
- Value
- 1 named: ElevenLabs, the vendor's own voice models ("the probability that it was generated with ElevenLabs AI voice technology"); the FAQ states "It is not a general-purpose detector for every AI voice provider" and the Eleven v3 model is not reliably classified (elevenlabs.io/ai-speech-classifier, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Checking an ElevenLabs clip against the vendor that made it.
- Main limitation
- No outside generator is covered and no study in the index tested the classifier; the precision and recall figures are the vendor's own.

SEO.ai
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a short named list on a free no-login tool.
- Value
- 4 named: GPT (ChatGPT and GPT-4 as one family), Bard, Claude and Gemini (seo.ai/tools/ai-content-detector, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the names and not counted: none. Bard and Gemini are counted as two names because the page lists two.
- Best for
- Marketing copy from the four named families.
- Main limitation
- Walters 2023 tested GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 papers only and printed 12% of 42 human papers called AI (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).

AI Writing Check
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the one named target of a tool that no longer runs.
- Value
- 1 named: ChatGPT, the only generator the archived page names; the withdrawal notice adds that the hosted algorithm was created by OpenAI (web.archive.org, 17 July 2023, aiwritingcheck.org, read 10 November 2026).
- Best for
- Readers reading a 2023 verdict on a ChatGPT-era essay.
- Main limitation
- The tool was taken down in August 2023; Liang 2023's 61.22% is an average across seven detectors (arXiv 2304.02819v3, read 10 November 2026).

Grammica
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want the one named target of a free tool removed in 2026.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT, as "Chat GPT 3" on the archived page, with "other AI models" unnamed (web.archive.org, 31 July 2025, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the name and not counted: "other AI models".
- Best for
- Readers reading a 2023 to 2025 Grammica percentage.
- Main limitation
- The detector was removed between 15 December 2025 and 12 January 2026; Walters 2023 printed 17% of 84 AI papers called human (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).

IvyPanda
- Verdict
- Fits readers who want a free colour-coded check aimed at one generator family.
- Value
- 1 named: GPT, as ChatGPT and GPT on the page, whose FAQ defines GPT as "the third generation of Generative Pre-trained Transformer developed by OpenAI" (ivypanda.com/tools/gpt-essay-checker, read 10 November 2026); printed beside the name and not counted: none.
- Best for
- A short essay checked free against the GPT family.
- Main limitation
- The page calls the tool a beta and prints no figure; Walters 2023 returned 23% of 126 documents as uncertain (DOI 10.1515/opis-2022-0158, Table 4, read 8 November 2026).
How we ranked
- Field sorted
- Count of distinct generator models, families or products the vendor names as detected or trained against, each listed item once; a company counts once only where none of its models is named; catch-all phrases and headline counts ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators") are printed and not counted
- Direction
- Higher first
- Tie rule
- More study records first, then name
- Qualification
- A generators field that names at least one model; a card whose field names none is tabled apart
- Qualified
- 56 of 72 detectors
Field sorted: the generator count field on each card, written on 9 November 2026 from the generators list that was read on 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day, each from the vendor page recorded on the card. A name counts once when the vendor lists it as a model, a model family or a product whose output the detector scores or was trained against: ChatGPT, GPT-4 and GPT-5 are three names because the vendor lists three; "DALL-E 2 and 3" is one name because the vendor lists one item with two versions; Turnitin's 35 are the 33 rows of its version table plus the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 generators its Spanish and Japanese models name. A company name counts once only where no model of that company is named on the same page (Proofademic's research page). Catch-all phrases ("other LLMs", "many others", "and more"), headline counts ("35+ LLM families", "500+ generators", "26 models benchmarked", "about 90 further classes") and announced partners ("coming soon") are printed in the row and not counted. Direction: more names rank higher. Tie rule: more study records first, then product name, so Hive (2 records) sits above Sightengine (1) at 33, Copyleaks (9) above AI or Not (1) at 15, ZeroGPT (7) above Sapling (3) above Phrasly (0) at 11, GPTZero (16) above Originality.ai (7) above Winston AI (2) at 10. 56 of 72 qualify; 16 name no generator and are tabled apart. Full rules: methodology page. The count says how many names a vendor prints, never how many models a detector catches; the independently tested ranking and the GPT-4 question say which generators a study actually ran.
Why numbers differ between sources
A vendor can print a headline count, a named list, or both, and the two rarely agree. ZeroGPT names eleven models and states "35+ LLM families" (zerogpt.com, read 8 November 2026); TruthScan names thirteen and states "500+ generators" for images (truthscan.com, read 9 November 2026); Pangram names sixteen and states "26 models benchmarked" (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); Resemble Detect names 62 and states "250+" (resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026). This page counts the names, because a name can be checked against a model that exists and a headline count cannot. Turnitin lists versions where other vendors list families, so its 35 rows cover fewer families than GPTZero's ten names (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026); the page counts what each vendor chose to print. Hive publishes class identifiers (sora2, gptimage1_5) in its documentation rather than marketing names, and the count follows the documentation (docs.thehive.ai, read 8 November 2026). Writer and BrandWell are counted from archived pages because the live pages redirect, read 9 November 2026. All read 8 and 9 November 2026; the Updated line is the date the page last changed.
Questions about the generators AI detectors name
Which AI detector names the most generator models?
Resemble Detect, with 62 named voice, image and video generators on its product page (resemble.ai, read 9 November 2026). Among text detectors, Turnitin names 35 model versions (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026).
Does naming a model mean the detector catches its output?
No. The count records what a vendor printed, read 8 and 9 November 2026; whether a detector catches a model's output is a question for a study, and the independently tested ranking lists the 21 cards with one. Turnitin names 35 versions and Van Vlasselaer 2026 scored all 40 of its fully AI papers under 20% (Van Vlasselaer 2026).
Which AI detectors name GPT-5 or GPT-6?
GPT-5: QuillBot, Pangram (GPT 5.6 and GPT-5.4), GPTZero, Copyleaks, Phrasly, Sapling, JustDone, ZeroGPT, Proofademic, Walter Writes, Turnitin (GPT-5 to GPT-5.4-pro), Undetectable AI, Smodin and Quetext, 14 cards; GPT-6: QuillBot, Grammarly, GPTZero, ZeroGPT and Originality.ai (GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol), 5 cards, per the generators field of each card read 8 and 9 November 2026. The ChatGPT coverage question reads the ChatGPT names.
Which AI detectors name Claude and Gemini?
Claude is named by 25 of the 36 cards with a list and Gemini by 26, per the generators fields read 8 and 9 November 2026 (Hive, SynthID and Resemble Detect name a Gemini image or watermark source, not the chat model); the seven that name neither are WasItAI, Sightengine, Illuminarty, DetectGPT, Writer and the two GPT-2 tools.
Why are catch-all phrases and headline counts left out?
Because they cannot be checked. "35+ LLM families" names no family and "500+ generators" no generator; a named model can be matched to a release and a date, a headline count cannot. The headline is printed in every row where a vendor states one, read 8 and 9 November 2026, so a reader can see the gap between the claim and the names.
Which cards name no generator at all?
Six: Reality Defender, Turnitin Clarity, Deepware, Sensity, Codeleaks and Pindrop Pulse, per the generators field of each card read 9 November 2026 and tabled above. Pindrop states "350+ deepfake generation tools" and "120 AI voice generation systems" as counts with no name. Five more joined the second table on 10 November 2026 with the eleventh wave: GPT Radar (GPT-3 named as the engine, not a target), RADAR and Ghostbuster (experiment models, not a coverage claim), Hiya Deepfake Detector and McAfee Deepfake Detector (unnamed voice generators), read that day.
Which of the ranked cards has a study record?
Twenty-one of the 36: GPTZero (16), GPT-2 Output Detector (12), Copyleaks (9), Originality.ai (7), ZeroGPT (7), Turnitin (5), Writer (5), Pangram (4), GLTR (4), DetectGPT (4), Sapling (3), BrandWell (3), QuillBot (2), Winston AI (2), Hive (2), Scribbr (1), Compilatio (1), Undetectable AI (1), AI or Not (1), Illuminarty (1) and Sightengine (1), per the independently tested ranking at index version 2026.11.13. None of the records tests a vendor's list name by name.
How often is this ranking updated?
The ranking was created on 9 November 2026 from generators fields read on 8 and 9 November 2026 and changes whenever a vendor page recorded on a card adds or drops a name. The next scheduled recheck of every card's fields is 8 December 2026 (methodology).
Sources and revisions
Sources
- Resemble Detect product pageresemble.ai/products/detect
- Turnitin AI writing detection FAQsguides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284...
- Hive AI image and video detection documentationdocs.thehive.ai/docs/ai-image-and-video-d...
- Sightengine AI-generated image detectionsightengine.com/detect-ai-generated-images
- Pangram home pagepangram.com
- Copyleaks AI Detectorcopyleaks.com/ai-content-detector
- AI or Not AI image detectoraiornot.com/ai-image-detector
- TruthScan AI detectortruthscan.com/ai-detector
- WasItAIwasitai.com
- ZeroGPTzerogpt.com
- Sapling AI Content Detectorsapling.ai/ai-content-detector
- Phrasly AI Detectorphrasly.ai/ai-detector
- GPTZero FAQgptzero.me/faq
- Originality.ai home pageoriginality.ai
- Winston AI product pagegowinston.ai/ai-content-detector
- Quetext AI Content Detectorquetext.com/ai-content-detector
- Proofademic home pageproofademic.ai
- SynthIDsynthid.com
- JustDone AI Detectorjustdone.com/ai-detector
- Codequiry AI code detectioncodequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code
- Scribbr AI Detectorscribbr.com/ai-detector
- DetectGPT paperarxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305
- Undetectable AI detectorundetectable.ai/ai-detector
- QuillBot AI Content Detectorquillbot.com/ai-content-detector
- Grammarly AI Detectorgrammarly.com/ai-detector
- Smodin AI Content Detectorsmodin.io/ai-content-detector
- BrandWell AI Content Detector (archived 9 August 2026)web.archive.org/web/20260809041054/https:...
- Walter Writes AI Detectorwalterwrites.ai/ai-detector
- Surfer AI Content Detectorsurfer.ai/ai-content-detector
- Grammarly Authorship support articlesupport.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/2...
- AIDetectPlusaidetectplus.com/ai-detector
- Illuminarty image detectionilluminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag...
- Compilatio AI detector v4.6.2compilatio.net/en/whats-new/introduction-...
- Writer AI Content Detector (archived 9 December 2025)web.archive.org/web/20251209115654/https:...
- GPT-2 Output Detector model cardhuggingface.co/openai-community/roberta-b...
- GLTRgltr.io
- Reality Defender deepfake video detectionrealitydefender.com/deepfake-video-detection
- Deepware FAQdeepware.ai/us/faq/index.html
- Sensity deepfake detectionsensity.ai/deepfake-detection-for-video-i...
- Copyleaks Codeleaks launch releasecopyleaks.com/about-us/press-releases/cop...
- Pindrop Pulse Inspect launchpindrop.com/company-news/pindrop-launches...
Revision log
- Ranking created from the generator count field written at index version 2026
- Nine wave 9 cards added
- Twelve wave 10 cards added
- Nine wave 11 cards added
). Illuminarty, one of four cards added in the same wave, joined with its one image record from Ha and Passananti 2024, so 18 of 72 cards now qualify.: register plate](/img/independently-tested-480.webp)


