AI detectors ranked by the LMS platforms the vendor names

Compilatio names seven learning management platforms on its LMS integration page, Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace (D2L), Blackboard, Microsoft Teams, Open LMS and Cineca, the most of any detector in the index, per compilatio.net, read 9 November 2026. Copyleaks names six of the nine platforms this ranking counts, Canvas, D2L, Moodle, Blackboard, Schoology and Google Classroom, plus Edsby and Sakai outside the nine (copyleaks.com, read 8 November 2026). Turnitin, Pangram and Turnitin Clarity name four each, read 8 and 9 November 2026. Fourteen of the 72 cards name at least one platform, the same fourteen the LMS integrations view lists (PlagiarismCheck at 6 of 9 and Detecting-AI.com at 1 of 9 joined on 10 November 2026, and Trinka at 4 of 9 later the same day on a platform-wide institutional line); two more state an LMS route through an API without naming a platform and sit in a second table.

Updated Vendor pages read 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day

Short answer

The sort is the count of named platforms, a description of each vendor's own list and not a test of any integration: Compilatio 7 of 9, read 9 November 2026; Copyleaks 6, read 8 November 2026; Turnitin 4, read 8 November 2026, Pangram 4, read 8 November 2026, and Turnitin Clarity 4, read 9 November 2026, in that order on study records; Codequiry 3, read 9 November 2026, and Walter Writes 3, read 8 November 2026; GPTZero 2 and Originality.ai 2, read 8 November 2026; Winston AI 1, read 8 November 2026, and Grammarly Authorship 1, read 9 November 2026. The nine platforms counted are Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L or Brightspace (one platform under two names), Schoology, Google Classroom, Open LMS, Microsoft Teams as an assignment integration, and Cineca. No detector score should be the only evidence in a misconduct decision, whichever LMS delivers it.

How we ranked

AI detectors ranked by the LMS platforms the vendor names: register plate with the page title and its register ID
Named LMS platforms, of 9 per detector, from the index data file.

Which AI detectors name the most LMS platforms?

AI detectors ranked by the LMS platforms the vendor names: the decision table
RankDetectorPlatforms namedWhich platforms, source and read dateStudy recordsBest forMain limitation
1Compilatio7 of 9Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace (D2L), Blackboard (Learn and Learn Ultra), Microsoft Teams, Open LMS, Cineca (compilatio.net/en/lms-integration, read 9 November 2026)1European institutions on Open LMS, Cineca or Teams assignments beside the four large LMSsSold by demo and quote; 1 study record, from 2023, on the free tool; 7 of 9 QuillBot-paraphrased texts missed in Weber-Wulff 2023
2Copyleaks6 of 9Canvas, D2L, Moodle, Blackboard, Schoology, Google Classroom; Edsby and Sakai are also named and fall outside the nine counted (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026)9US districts and universities that run Schoology or Google Classroom beside a main LMSEducation and Enterprise plans are custom priced; 10 of 10 Spanish human theses flagged in Orenstrakh 2023
3PlagiarismCheck6 of 9Canvas, Moodle, Google Classroom, Schoology, Brightspace, Blackboard (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); Populi is also named and falls outside the nine1Schools on any of the six large LMS platforms that want the detector inside a plagiarism suiteThe one record ranked the tool 13th of 14 with 19 of 36 AI documents undetected, Weber-Wulff 2023; Populi, a seventh named LMS, is not counted
4Turnitin4 of 9Moodle, Blackboard, Canvas through the Similarity Report; Microsoft Teams through the Feedback Studio integration only (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026)5Institutions that already license Turnitin Originality inside their LMSThe vendor states no AI indicator is embedded in the LMS user interface; licence only, no free tier
5Pangram4 of 9Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle, Brightspace (D2L) (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026)4Teams that want four LMS routes and four study records, including 0 of 40 human papers flagged in Van Vlasselaer 2026Team plan from $40 a month for 2 seats; 45.5% of 1,163 real theses flagged when run alone in Van Vlasselaer 2026
6Trinka4 of 9Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L, from the pricing page's institutional line "LMS & SSO Integration (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L & more)" (trinka.ai/pricing, read 10 November 2026)0Institutions on one of the four named platforms that want the Trinka platform with its detectorThe line describes the Trinka platform, not the detector; "& more" names nothing; no study record
7Turnitin Clarity4 of 9Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L, through LTI 1.3 (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/376..., read 9 November 2026)0Feedback Studio customers who want the writing process recorded inside the LMSAI writing results need the Originality add-on; licensed at an additional cost; no study record
8Codequiry3 of 9Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, by bulk import, plus a generic LTI integration (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026)0Computer science departments pulling code submissions out of three LMSsCode only; LMS integrations sit on the Advanced add-on; no study record
9Walter Writes3 of 9Canvas, Moodle, Schoology, reached through the API; the card records that a native plugin is not published (walterwrites.ai/chrome-extension/?utm_sou..., read 8 November 2026)0Schools with a developer who can wire the API into the LMSNo native plugin stated; Teams plan $139 a month for 10 members; no study record
10GPTZero2 of 9Google Classroom, Canvas; the Chrome extension also covers Classroom (gptzero.me, read 8 November 2026)16Teachers in Google Classroom who want the detector with 16 study records52 of 114 human coursework submissions flagged in Orenstrakh 2023; Professional Team Plan price did not render
11Originality.ai2 of 9Google Classroom through the Chrome extension; Moodle through Moodle Plugin 2.0 (originality.ai/extensions, read 8 November 2026)7Moodle institutions on an Enterprise planClassroom coverage runs through a browser extension, not a plugin; 19 of 495 human passages flagged in Epoch AI 2026
12Winston AI1 of 9Google Classroom (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026)2Classroom-only schools that also want image checksOne platform named; Enterprise pricing by sales; 2 study records
13Detecting-AI.com1 of 9Moodle, through an API-based connector with a server-side key (detecting-ai.com/integrations/moodle, read 10 November 2026)0Moodle sites that want AI detection through the vendor's APIA connector rather than a listed plugin; no study record; the 99% claim has no base
14Grammarly Authorship1 of 9Canvas, as Authorship reports attached to Canvas LMS submissions (grammarly.com/authorship, read 9 November 2026)0Writing programmes that want a process record rather than a verdictA process record, not a classifier; one platform; no study record

Cards that state an LMS route without naming a platform

DetectorWhat the integrations field statesSource, read date
ZeroGPT"LMS or enterprise systems via API (no named LMS)", beside WhatsApp and Telegram botszerogpt.com/faq, read 8 November 2026
Proofademic"Developer platform API for campus systems"proofademic.ai/privacy-policy/?utm_source..., read 8 November 2026

The remaining 47 cards name no LMS and no LMS route in their integrations field: QuillBot, Grammarly, Scribbr, Phrasly, Sapling, JustDone, Hive, GLTR, AIDetectPlus, GPT-2 Output Detector, WasItAI, Reality Defender, Writer, Undetectable AI, AI or Not, SynthID, Smodin, BrandWell, Surfer, Quetext, TruthScan, DetectGPT, Sightengine, Deepware, Sensity, Codeleaks, Illuminarty, Pindrop Pulse, Resemble Detect, and from the ninth and tenth waves of 10 November 2026 Decopy, Content Detector AI, GPTKit, Isgen, AI Detector Pro, Fast-DetectGPT, Paperpal, Binoculars, Monica, StealthWriter, Wordtune, Check For AI, Writefull, Passed.ai (Google Classroom appears only on its closing notice as an Originality.ai feature), ElevenLabs Classifier, FakeCatcher, Deepfake-O-Meter and Ircam Amplify. Most of them are web tools, browser extensions and APIs; the Turnitin and Compilatio cards show that an LMS list is a feature of the institutional products, not the consumer detectors.

One of the plan rankings in the rankings hub, beside platform integrations, which counts eight surface types, and file types. The LMS integrations view prints every LMS entry as the vendor words it; this page counts the named platforms. The Canvas without Turnitin question reads the Canvas subset. The home board answers which AI detectors work inside an LMS?

Which AI detectors should you check first?

  • Compilatio, rank 1Best for: European institutions on Open LMS, Cineca or Teams assignments beside the four large LMSs. Main limitation: Sold by demo and quote; 1 study record, from 2023, on the free tool; 7 of 9 QuillBot-paraphrased texts missed in Weber-Wulff 2023.
  • Copyleaks, rank 2Best for: US districts and universities that run Schoology or Google Classroom beside a main LMS. Main limitation: Education and Enterprise plans are custom priced; 10 of 10 Spanish human theses flagged in Orenstrakh 2023.
  • PlagiarismCheck, rank 3Best for: Schools on any of the six large LMS platforms that want the detector inside a plagiarism suite. Main limitation: The one record ranked the tool 13th of 14 with 19 of 36 AI documents undetected, Weber-Wulff 2023; Populi, a seventh named LMS, is not counted.
  • Turnitin, rank 4Best for: Institutions that already license Turnitin Originality inside their LMS. Main limitation: The vendor states no AI indicator is embedded in the LMS user interface; licence only, no free tier.
  • Pangram, rank 5Best for: Teams that want four LMS routes and four study records, including 0 of 40 human papers flagged in Van Vlasselaer 2026. Main limitation: Team plan from $40 a month for 2 seats; 45.5% of 1,163 real theses flagged when run alone in Van Vlasselaer 2026.

What does each card name, tool by tool?

1

Compilatio

Verdict
Fits institutions whose LMS is one of the two European platforms no other card names.
Value
7 of 9 platforms: Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace (D2L), Blackboard (Learn and Learn Ultra), Microsoft Teams, Open LMS and Cineca, each with a native plugin, plus an LTI custom integration and SSO, on the LMS integration page (compilatio.net/en/lms-integration, read 9 November 2026). The LMS integrations view lists the six native plugins and Teams beside them; this ranking counts Teams as the seventh named platform because the page lists it as an assignment integration.
Best for
Universities in France, Italy and Spain on Open LMS or Cineca, and Teams-for-Education schools.
Main limitation
Magister+ is sold by demo and quote, and the one indexed record, Weber-Wulff 2023, tested the free tool in March 2023: 40 of 54 documents correct and 0 false accusations in 18 human documents, but 7 of 9 QuillBot-paraphrased texts missed (Weber-Wulff 2023).
Read the Compilatio card
2

Copyleaks

Verdict
Fits US districts that run Schoology or Classroom alongside Canvas, D2L, Moodle or Blackboard.
Value
6 of 9 platforms: Canvas, D2L, Moodle, Blackboard, Schoology and Google Classroom, on the product page (copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026); the same page names Edsby and Sakai, which the nine-platform list does not count, so the card's LMS list runs to eight names.
Best for
Districts that need one vendor across a main LMS and a Classroom or Schoology deployment.
Main limitation
Education and Enterprise plans carry no published price, and Orenstrakh 2023 recorded all 10 Spanish human theses flagged as AI (Orenstrakh 2023).
Read the Copyleaks card
4

Turnitin

Verdict
Fits institutions already inside a Turnitin Originality licence.
Value
4 of 9 platforms: Moodle, Blackboard and Canvas through the Similarity Report, with the vendor's own note that no AI indicator is embedded in the LMS user interface, and Microsoft Teams through the Feedback Studio integration only (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284..., read 8 November 2026). The FAQ's "etc." names no further platform and adds nothing to the count.
Best for
Schools whose instructors already open the Similarity Report for every submission.
Main limitation
No free tier and no self-serve plan; the AI result sits in Turnitin's report, not the LMS grade view; Van Vlasselaer 2026 recorded all 40 fully AI papers scored under 20% (Van Vlasselaer 2026).
Read the Turnitin card
5

Pangram

Verdict
Fits teams that want the broadest LMS reach among the cards with four or more study records.
Value
4 of 9 platforms: Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle and Brightspace (D2L), listed among the integrations on the home page (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); the Team plan is $40 a month for 2 seats.
Best for
Departments that want 0 of 40 human papers flagged in Van Vlasselaer 2026 and 0 of 1,992 in Jabarian and Imas 2025 behind their LMS (Jabarian and Imas 2025).
Main limitation
The same Van Vlasselaer 2026 paper, running Pangram alone on 1,163 real theses, saw 45.5% flagged (Van Vlasselaer 2026).
Read the Pangram card
7

Turnitin Clarity

Verdict
Fits Feedback Studio customers who want the composing process recorded inside their LMS.
Value
4 of 9 platforms: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L through LTI 1.3, which the administrator FAQ calls recommended for the optimal experience (guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/376..., read 9 November 2026); AI writing results appear only when the Originality add-on is licensed.
Best for
Institutions that already pay for Feedback Studio and the Originality add-on.
Main limitation
Licensed separately at an additional cost with no published price; no indexed study has scored Clarity.
Read the Turnitin Clarity card
8

Codequiry

Verdict
Fits computer science departments that collect code through an LMS.
Value
3 of 9 platforms: Canvas, Moodle and Blackboard, each by bulk import of submissions, plus an LTI LMS integration that names no further platform (codequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Instructors who want AI code detection and peer similarity on submissions pulled from three LMSs.
Main limitation
Code only, and the LMS integrations sit on the Advanced add-on at US$299; no indexed study has scored Codequiry.
Read the Codequiry card
9

Walter Writes

Verdict
Fits schools with a developer on hand.
Value
3 of 9 platforms: Canvas, Moodle and Schoology, named inside the integrations entry "LMS via API" with the note that a native plugin is not published (walterwrites.ai/chrome-extension/?utm_sou..., read 8 November 2026).
Best for
Teams that already wire the API into their systems and want the Chrome extension for staff.
Main limitation
No native plugin, so the three platforms are reached through code; Teams plan $139 a month for 10 members; no indexed study has scored Walter Writes.
Read the Walter Writes card
10

GPTZero

Verdict
Fits Google Classroom teachers who want the card with the most study records.
Value
2 of 9 platforms: Google Classroom and Canvas, listed on the home page, with the Chrome extension also covering Classroom (gptzero.me, read 8 November 2026).
Best for
Teachers whose school lives in Classroom and who want 16 indexed records behind the tool (independently tested ranking).
Main limitation
Orenstrakh 2023 recorded 52 of 114 human coursework submissions flagged (Orenstrakh 2023); the Professional Team Plan price did not render on the pricing page.
Read the GPTZero card
11

Originality.ai

Verdict
Fits Moodle institutions on an Enterprise plan.
Value
2 of 9 platforms: Google Classroom through the Chrome extension and Moodle through Moodle Plugin 2.0, on the extensions page (originality.ai/extensions, read 8 November 2026).
Best for
Moodle schools that want a plugin rather than a browser extension.
Main limitation
Classroom coverage is a browser extension, and Epoch AI 2026 flagged 19 of 495 pre-2022 human passages (Epoch AI 2026).
Read the Originality.ai card
12

Winston AI

Verdict
Fits Classroom-only schools that also want image checks.
Value
1 of 9 platforms: Google Classroom, listed among the integrations on the product page (gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector, read 8 November 2026).
Best for
Small schools on Google Classroom with handwriting or image checks to run.
Main limitation
One platform; Enterprise pricing by sales; Weber-Wulff 2023 recorded 12 of 36 AI documents undetected (Weber-Wulff 2023).
Read the Winston AI card
14

Grammarly Authorship

Verdict
Fits writing programmes that want a process record attached to a Canvas submission.
Value
1 of 9 platforms: Canvas, as Authorship reports attached to Canvas LMS submissions on the product page (grammarly.com/authorship, read 9 November 2026).
Best for
Instructors who want to see how a draft was typed, pasted and edited.
Main limitation
Authorship is a process record, not a classifier, so no detection rate exists for it; no indexed study has scored it.
Read the Grammarly Authorship card
3

PlagiarismCheck

Verdict
Fits schools whose LMS is one of the six counted platforms and that already run a plagiarism suite.
Value
6 of 9 platforms: Canvas, Moodle, Google Classroom, Schoology, Brightspace and Blackboard, named as LMS integrations on the AI detector page (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026). The page also names Populi, a college information system with an LMS, which falls outside the nine-platform list this ranking counts and is recorded on the card without a count (ruling of 10 November 2026).
Best for
Districts and colleges on Canvas, Moodle or Google Classroom that want AI detection with sentence-level thresholds in the same suite.
Main limitation
The one indexed record, Weber-Wulff 2023, tested the detector in May 2023 and ranked it 13th of 14, with 0 false accusations in 18 human documents and 19 of 36 AI documents undetected (Weber-Wulff 2023).
Read the PlagiarismCheck card
13

Detecting-AI.com

Verdict
Fits Moodle administrators who can wire an API key into a connector.
Value
1 of 9 platforms: Moodle, through an API-based connector for assignment text using a server-side API key, offered as a Moodle plugin or a direct REST integration (detecting-ai.com/integrations/moodle, read 10 November 2026).
Best for
Moodle sites that already use the vendor's API.
Main limitation
No other LMS is named; no study in the index tested Detecting-AI.com, and the vendor's 99% (accuracy) and under-1% false positive figures carry no base.
Read the Detecting-AI.com card
6

Trinka

Verdict
Fits institutions on Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard or D2L that buy the writing platform with the detector inside it.
Value
4 of 9 platforms: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L, named on the pricing page's Trinka for Institutions line as "LMS & SSO Integration (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L & more)" (trinka.ai/pricing, read 10 November 2026); "& more" adds no count.
Best for
Research universities that want manuscript checking and AI detection in one institutional licence.
Main limitation
The statement is platform-wide and does not say the detector runs inside the LMS; institutional pricing is custom; no study in the index tested Trinka (ruling of 10 November 2026).
Read the Trinka card

How we ranked

Field sorted
Count of named LMS platforms in the card's integrations list, of nine: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L or Brightspace (one platform), Schoology, Google Classroom, Open LMS, Microsoft Teams where listed as an assignment integration, Cineca; "LTI" and "LMS via API" name no platform
Direction
Higher first
Tie rule
More study records first, then name
Qualification
At least one of the nine named on a vendor page; a card that states an LMS route with no named platform is listed apart
Qualified
14 of 72 detectors

Field sorted: the LMS count field on each card, written on 9 November 2026 from the integrations list that was read on 8 November 2026 for the first sixteen cards and 9 November 2026 for the twenty-six added that day, each from the vendor page recorded on the card. A platform counts when the integrations field names it and it is one of nine: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L or Brightspace (counted once, because D2L sells Brightspace), Schoology, Google Classroom, Open LMS, Microsoft Teams and Cineca. Teams counts where the field lists it as an assignment or LMS integration (Compilatio's LMS page, Turnitin's Feedback Studio integration) and not where it is a meeting-detection surface (Reality Defender's RealMeeting, Pindrop Pulse for Meetings, Resemble Detect's meeting detection), which is a different product category. A generic entry, "LTI integration" or "LMS via API", names no platform and adds nothing, and Edsby and Sakai, which Copyleaks names, fall outside the nine. Direction: more platforms rank higher. Tie rule: more study records first, then product name, so Turnitin (5 records) sits above Pangram (4) and Turnitin Clarity (0) at four platforms, Codequiry above Walter Writes at three on name, GPTZero (16) above Originality.ai (7) at two, and Winston AI (2) above Grammarly Authorship (0) at one. 14 of 72 qualify. Full rules: methodology page. The count says how many platforms a vendor names, never whether an integration works, what it costs or whether the AI result appears inside the LMS; Turnitin's own FAQ says its AI indicator does not.

Why numbers differ between sources

The LMS integrations view and this ranking read the same field and print different shapes of it. The view lists Compilatio's six native plugins and names Microsoft Teams, LTI and SSO beside them (compilatio.net, read 9 November 2026); this page counts Teams as the seventh platform because the vendor lists it on the LMS page as an assignment integration, so the view's six and this page's seven describe one list. Copyleaks names eight LMSs on its product page (copyleaks.com, read 8 November 2026) and scores six here because Edsby and Sakai are outside the nine counted. The platform integrations ranking counts "an LMS" as one surface of eight, so a card with seven platforms and a card with one score the same there. Turnitin's FAQ names "Moodle, Blackboard, Canvas, etc." (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026); the "etc." is not a platform and is not counted. All read 8 and 9 November 2026; the Updated line is the date the page last changed.

An LMS integration is sold with an institutional licence more often than with a self-serve plan, and the nonprofit and education question lists the twelve cards that name such a programme, read 10 November 2026; the team seats and SSO view lists which of them state SSO beside the LMS.

Questions about AI detector LMS coverage

Which AI detector names the most LMS platforms?

Compilatio, with seven of the nine counted: Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace (D2L), Blackboard, Microsoft Teams, Open LMS and Cineca, on its LMS integration page (compilatio.net, read 9 November 2026). Copyleaks is next with six (copyleaks.com, read 8 November 2026).

Which AI detectors work in Canvas?

Nine cards name Canvas: Compilatio, Copyleaks, Turnitin, Pangram, Turnitin Clarity, Codequiry, Walter Writes, GPTZero and Grammarly Authorship, per the integrations field of each card read 8 and 9 November 2026. The Canvas without Turnitin question sets the seven non-Turnitin cards beside their plans.

Which AI detectors work in Moodle?

Eight: Compilatio, Copyleaks, Turnitin, Pangram, Turnitin Clarity, Codequiry, Walter Writes and Originality.ai, which ships Moodle Plugin 2.0 (originality.ai/extensions, read 8 November 2026). Walter Writes reaches Moodle through its API with no native plugin published (walterwrites.ai, read 8 November 2026).

Does a named LMS mean the AI score shows inside the LMS?

Not always. Turnitin's FAQ states that no AI indicator is embedded in the LMS user interface and that the result sits in the Similarity Report (guides.turnitin.com, read 8 November 2026), and Turnitin Clarity shows AI writing results only with the Originality add-on (guides.turnitin.com, read 9 November 2026). The count records names, not screens.

Why is Microsoft Teams counted for Compilatio and Turnitin but not for Reality Defender?

Compilatio lists Teams on its LMS integration page and Turnitin names a Feedback Studio integration for Teams assignments, both read 8 and 9 November 2026; Reality Defender's RealMeeting, Pindrop Pulse for Meetings and Resemble Detect's meeting detection scan live calls in Teams, which is a meeting product, not a place where student work is submitted. The rule is stated in the method above.

Which LMS cards have study records?

Six of the eleven: GPTZero (16 records), Copyleaks (9), Originality.ai (7), Turnitin (5), Pangram (4) and Winston AI (2); Compilatio has 1, and Turnitin Clarity, Codequiry, Walter Writes and Grammarly Authorship have none, per the independently tested ranking at index version 2026.11.13.

Do the free detectors name any LMS?

No. The 29 cards with no LMS entry include every free web tool in the index, from Scribbr to Smodin, read 8 and 9 November 2026; ZeroGPT states an API route to "LMS or enterprise systems" with no named LMS (zerogpt.com/faq, read 8 November 2026). An LMS plugin is a feature of the institutional plans in this index.

How often is this ranking updated?

The ranking was created on 9 November 2026 from integrations fields read on 8 and 9 November 2026 and changes whenever a vendor page recorded on a card adds or drops a named platform. The next scheduled recheck of every card's plan and integration fields is 8 December 2026 (methodology).

Sources and revisions

Sources

  1. Compilatio LMS integrationcompilatio.net/en/lms-integration
  2. Copyleaks AI Detector product pagecopyleaks.com/ai-content-detector
  3. Turnitin AI writing detection FAQsguides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/284...
  4. Pangram home pagepangram.com
  5. Turnitin Clarity administrator FAQsguides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/376...
  6. Codequiry AI code detectioncodequiry.com/detect-ai-written-code
  7. Walter Writes Chrome extension and integrationswalterwrites.ai/chrome-extension
  8. GPTZero home pagegptzero.me
  9. Originality.ai extensionsoriginality.ai/extensions
  10. Winston AI product pagegowinston.ai/ai-content-detector
  11. Grammarly Authorshipgrammarly.com/authorship
  12. ZeroGPT FAQzerogpt.com/faq
  13. Proofademic privacy policy (integrations)proofademic.ai/privacy-policy

Revision log

  1. Ranking created from the lms count field written at index version 2026
  2. Nine wave 9 cards added
  3. Twelve wave 10 cards added
  4. Nine wave 11 cards added
  5. Twelfth-wave pages linked

Corrections log

Related reading