Illuminarty AI image detector
Vendor KI-Tech Hertig Official site illuminarty.ai/en How this card is sourced
Illuminarty flagged 67.40% of 280 human artworks as AI-generated in Ha and Passananti 2024, the highest false positive rate of the three commercial image detectors the paper tested, beside 72.65% accuracy and a 4.69% false negative rate on 350 AI images (arXiv 2402.03214, Table 1, read 9 November 2026). Illuminarty is an AI image detector first: its home page asks "Is it an AI or a human artist that created your image?" and describes a text detector that the vendor's own release post calls "a proof-of-concept", so the card's study, claim and limit fields describe images (illuminarty.ai/en and release post of 18 March 2023, read 9 November 2026). The vendor is KI-Tech Hertig, under Swiss law with Zurich courts, and the basic detection is free with paid plans at $10.00 and $30.00 a month. The card joins the detector index as the third image card with a study record, and how this card is sourced explains why an image result stays off the text rankings.
What Illuminarty detects
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Content types detected | Image, text | illuminarty.ai/en |
| Generators covered | The detector returns 'the likelihood of the image being generated from one of the public AI generation models' and a 'breakdown of detected generators ... for each possible generator including the human artists for hand-drawn images', Named in the release post's validation table: Dalle2, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion (and its variants), 'The number of generators shown from Illuminarty will gradually increase as new AI generation models are deployed' (image page) | illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag... |
| Input limits | Web app at app.illuminarty.ai and an API. Known problems listed by the vendor on 18 March 2023: 'Cannot process large images (> 3MB)', 'Fails on specific art styles, e.g. color schemes, line styles', 'Fails on high resolution images' and 'Fails on photographs, anime and game screenshots'; the vendor said it would lift the size limit 'as we improve our infrastructure'. API usage is 10,000 requests a day on Basic, 40,000 a day on Pro and unlimited on Enterprise. The image result includes localized detection (regions of the image) and model identification on paid plans; the text detector marks 'the specific passages ... most likely the result of AI generation'. No format list is published. | illuminarty.ai/en/posts/big-spring-update... |
| Free tier | Free plan at $0.00 a month: AI image classification and AI text classification in the web app; 'AI detection will always be free, but we offer additional features as a monthly subscription to sustain the service' | illuminarty.ai/en |
| API | Yes, illuminarty.ai/en | illuminarty.ai/en |
| Integrations | REST API ('Integrate automated AI detection into your service through our API'; 10,000 requests a day on Basic, 40,000 on Pro, unlimited on Enterprise); api.illuminarty.ai answered with an empty page on 9 November 2026 and no documentation page was found, Web app at app.illuminarty.ai, Browser add-on announced as in development in the release post of 18 March 2023, not shipped on the pages read | illuminarty.ai/en |
| Data retention | Privacy Policy (last updated November 16, 2022): 'Any image uploaded to our server will be processed in order to provide our service to you' and 'Any image uploaded to our server will be kept only for the duration necessary to provide our service to you'; 'We do not collect any personal information given to us indirectly'. Feedback form data is held by Typeform S.L. No period is stated for text submissions and no deletion schedule is given. | illuminarty.ai/en/privacy.html |
| Launch year | 2022 | illuminarty.ai/en/posts/big-spring-update... |
| Ownership | KI-Tech Hertig, named as 'the Company' in the Terms and Conditions (last updated November 16, 2022), governed by the laws of Switzerland with exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Zurich; contact art@illuminarty.ai. The site is served in English and German, links a Patreon, a Discord and a subreddit, and its 'who built Illuminarty' page returned 404 on 9 November 2026. The release post of 18 March 2023 dates the prototype to 'last year' and describes the project as run on subscriptions and donations 'to support the growing server fees and training costs'; the same post calls the text detector 'a proof-of-concept'. | illuminarty.ai/en/terms.html |
| Independent studies | 1 record | Studies index |
The image page promises to "Check whether or not an image has been AI-generated, from which AI model it has been generated from, and which regions of the image have been generated", returning "the likelihood of the image being generated from one of the public AI generation models" with "a breakdown of our detection result, for each possible generator including the human artists for hand-drawn images" (illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-image-detection, read 9 November 2026). Localized detection marks "the specific regions from the given image that increased the likelihood of AI generation". The only generators the vendor names are in its release post's validation table: Dalle2, Midjourney and "Stable Diffusion (and its variants)", with the promise that "The number of generators shown from Illuminarty will gradually increase as new AI generation models are deployed".
The text detector exists on the same site. The text page says it will "Detect AI generated texts" and mark "which parts of the text have been generated", and the release post explains its status: "We have implemented a proof-of-concept for text detection on the new website. Since it is yet a proof-of-concept, there is a lot of room for improvement and thus the results should be taken with caution" (illuminarty.ai/en/text and the release post, read 9 November 2026). The card records text as a modality in the vendor's words and takes no text figure from it. Language does not apply to the image detector; the site is served in English and German, and no language list is published for text.
The company is KI-Tech Hertig, named as "the Company" in the Terms and Conditions last updated November 16, 2022, which are "governed by the laws of Switzerland" with "exclusive jurisdiction" for "the courts in Zürich" (illuminarty.ai/en/terms, read 9 November 2026). The site links a Patreon, a Discord and a subreddit, and its "who built Illuminarty" page returned 404 on 9 November 2026. The two image cards tested in the same paper are Hive, which the authors called "the clear winner", and AI or Not, tested under its 2023 name Optic.
Limits and plans
| Plan | Price | Limits | Checked on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0.00 /mo | AI image classification; AI text classification. | |
| Basic | $10.00 /mo | AI image classification; AI image localized detection; AI model identification for image generators; AI text classification; AI text localized detection; API usage (10,000 requests/day). | |
| Pro | $30.00 /mo | All Basic plan functionalities, in nightly build; increased API usage (40,000 requests/day); API integration support. | |
| Enterprise | Price on request: user-based custom detection; unlimited API usage; custom API server; SLA. |
The vendor publishes its limits as a list of known problems in the release post of 18 March 2023: "Cannot process large images (> 3MB)", with a promise to "lift the size limit of the images as we improve our infrastructure"; "Fails on specific art styles, e.g. color schemes, line styles"; "Fails on high resolution images", which the vendor attributes to "artworks that use automated brushes and automated light expressions"; and "Fails on photographs, anime and game screenshots", because such media "tend to undergo a lot of post-processing, most of which use AI algorithms for rendering and upsampling" (release post, read 9 November 2026). The web app runs at app.illuminarty.ai; the API allows 10,000 requests a day on Basic and 40,000 on Pro, with unlimited usage on Enterprise. No format list is published, and api.illuminarty.ai answered with an empty page on 9 November 2026.
Pricing is a monthly subscription with a free tier the vendor says will stay free: "AI detection will always be free, but we offer additional features as a monthly subscription to sustain the service" (illuminarty.ai/en, read 9 November 2026). The release post explains the model: the subscriptions "are made to support the growing server fees and training costs for detection". Figures below are as displayed, in dollars, on 9 November 2026; the page states no currency and the company is Swiss.
Retention is stated in one sentence. The Privacy Policy, last updated November 16, 2022, reads: "Any image uploaded to our server will be processed in order to provide our service to you" and "Any image uploaded to our server will be kept only for the duration necessary to provide our service to you" (illuminarty.ai/en/privacy, read 9 November 2026). The policy states no period in days and no deletion-after-processing sentence, so the retention rank field is empty and the clause is quoted in the data retention ranking's second table. Nothing is said about text submissions; feedback form data goes to Typeform S.L.
What the vendor claims
No percentage on the home or image pages. Release post, 18 March 2023, 'validation accuracy ... within our collected dataset': AI Detection (binary) 91.8% previous model, 97.5% new model; Model Detection (multi-class) 90.1% and 96.4%; Dalle2 99.2% and 99.8%; Midjourney 68.9% and 88.5%; Stable Diffusion (and its variants) 79.1% and 93.5%. The post adds: 'these numbers need not match the actual experience of the users. This is because our current collected dataset does not cover the diverse styles and tools of the human artists'.
Illuminarty publishes no accuracy percentage on its home or image pages. Its figures are in the release post of 18 March 2023, as "validation accuracy" on "our collected dataset": binary AI detection rose from 91.8% with the previous model to 97.5% with the new one; multi-class model detection from 90.1% to 96.4%; Dalle2 from 99.2% to 99.8%; Midjourney from 68.9% to 88.5%; Stable Diffusion and its variants from 79.1% to 93.5% (release post, read 9 November 2026). The post qualifies them at once: "these numbers need not match the actual experience of the users. This is because our current collected dataset does not cover the diverse styles and tools of the human artists, the detector currently tends to pick up some of the drawing tools, e.g. automated brushes, as artifacts coming from an AI generator."
No false positive rate is published. The vendor's request to artists, "Please let us know if your works are deemed as AI generated, it helps us a lot to understand the errors", is the closest the pages come to one, and it anticipates the direction of the study result below. The terms add that "no parts of the output nor the output as whole, of the service, constitutes as a statement from the service owner or operators about any other party", and the footer disclaims "any kind" of warranty on the site's information (illuminarty.ai/en/terms, read 9 November 2026).
What independent studies found
- AIDI-S-0017Ha and Passananti 20242024
Illuminarty: 72.65% accuracy, 67.40% false positive rate and 4.69% false negative rate on 280 human artworks and 350 AI-generated images from five generators (Table 1), the highest false positive rate of the three commercial detectors; the authors describe 'even harsher treatment towards human art' than Optic's, and note that Illuminarty's creator told them in November 2023 that the model had not been updated for six months.
One record in the studies index tested Illuminarty. Ha and Passananti 2024 ran it beside Hive and Optic on 280 human artworks from 53 artists in seven styles and 350 AI images from five generators, reading scores over 60% as AI and under 40% as human; Illuminarty scored 72.65% accuracy, a 67.40% false positive rate and a 4.69% false negative rate (Table 1), against Hive's 98.03%, 0.00% and 3.17% and Optic's 90.67%, 24.47% and 1.15% (arXiv 2402.03214, read 9 November 2026). The authors write that Illuminarty showed "even harsher treatment towards human art" than Optic, and note that "Illuminarty's creator told the authors in November 2023 that the model had not been updated for six months". The paper prints no perturbation or Glaze result for Illuminarty, so the robustness field is empty.
The card pairs the vendor's 97.5% validation accuracy with the study's 72.65% for a claim gap of 24.85 percentage points, wider than any pairing the ranking held on 9 November 2026 (Compilatio's 15 points), with the pairing marked: the 97.5% is a release-post figure on the vendor's own dataset, not a product-page headline, and the vendor warned that it "need not match the actual experience of the users" (release post and arXiv 2402.03214, read 9 November 2026). The study measured a model the vendor said had sat unchanged for six months; nothing on the vendor's pages says whether it has changed since.
Where Illuminarty appears in the index
Rankings
- AIDI-R-01AI detectors ranked by independent testing Two records added in the fifth wave on 9 November 2026, Pegoraro 2023 and Fleckenstein 2024, changed nine counts and none: Pegoraro 2023 tested ZeroGPT, GPTZero, Copyleaks, Originality.ai, Writer, Content at Scale (BrandWell), DetectGPT, the GPT-2 Output Detector and GLTR, lifting GPTZero to 12, the GPT-2 Output Detector to 10, Copyleaks to 7 and Originality.ai and ZeroGPT to 6; Fleckenstein 2024 tested 289 teachers and no software, so it counts for no card ([Fleckenstein 2024 record](/studies/fleckenstein-2024-teachers/)). Illuminarty, one of four cards added in the same wave, joined with its one image record from Ha and Passananti 2024, so 18 of 72 cards now qualify.
- AIDI-R-07AI image, voice, video and code detectors ranked by independent studies
- AIDI-R-09AI detector false negative rates, ranked
- AIDI-R-11AI detectors ranked by named integration surfaces
- AIDI-R-17AI detectors ranked by the generator models the vendor names
- AIDI-R-20AI detectors ranked by launch year, with every change of hands and withdrawal the cards record
Fits these use cases
- Not listed in a use-case view at this index version.
Illuminarty ranks in three lists, read 9 November 2026 in the data file: independent testing on 1 record; studies by content type, where it joins AI or Not and Hive as the third card with a record on images; and the false negative rate ranking at 4.69% of 350 AI images, with the 67.40% false positive rate standing in the same row. The claim versus evidence gap carries the 24.85-point pairing with its marking. The 67.40% stays off the false positive rate ranking, which sorts rates on human-written text, under the same rule that keeps AI or Not's 24.47% and Hive's 0% there.
The card appears on AI detectors by content type, where image and text are its columns, text in the vendor's proof-of-concept sense, and on detectors with an API. Every detector card on the register shows the same fourteen fields, so the one image detector that charges $10 a month for model attribution can be read beside the enterprise media platforms that publish no price.
Questions about Illuminarty AI image detector
How accurate is Illuminarty?
72.65% accuracy on 280 human artworks and 350 AI images in Ha and Passananti 2024, with 67.40% of the human artworks flagged as AI and 4.69% of the AI images missed (Table 1); the vendor's own 2023 validation figure was 97.5% on its collected dataset.
Is Illuminarty free?
Yes for basic checks: the Free plan at $0.00 a month covers AI image and AI text classification, and the vendor says "AI detection will always be free"; Basic at $10.00 a month adds localized detection, model identification and API access, read 9 November 2026.
Why does Illuminarty flag human art as AI?
The vendor's release post says its dataset "does not cover the diverse styles and tools of the human artists" and that the detector "tends to pick up some of the drawing tools, e.g. automated brushes, as artifacts coming from an AI generator"; the 2024 study measured a 67.40% false positive rate on human artworks.
Does Illuminarty detect AI text?
It offers text classification, which the vendor's release post of 18 March 2023 calls "a proof-of-concept" whose "results should be taken with caution"; no text figure or language list is published, read 9 November 2026.
Does Illuminarty keep uploaded images?
The Privacy Policy of November 16, 2022 says an uploaded image "will be kept only for the duration necessary to provide our service to you", with no period in days and no statement about text, read 9 November 2026.
Sources and revisions
Sources
- illuminarty.ai/enRead 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/en/image/ai-generated-imag...Read 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/en/text.htmlRead 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/en/posts/big-spring-update...Read 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/en/privacy.htmlRead 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/en/terms.htmlRead 9 November 2026
- illuminarty.ai/who-built-illuminartyRead 8 November 2026
- arxiv.org/abs/2402.03214Read 9 November 2026



). Illuminarty, one of four cards added in the same wave, joined with its one image record from Ha and Passananti 2024, so 18 of 72 cards now qualify.: register plate](/img/independently-tested-480.webp)
