AI detectors with LMS integrations
An AI detector LMS integration is recorded on the index when the vendor names a learning management system in the integrations field: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L Brightspace, Schoology, Sakai, Edsby or Google Classroom. Of the 72 cards, 14 name at least one, and those 14 cards make up this view; the eighth, Codequiry, is a code detector added on 9 November 2026; Grammarly Authorship and Turnitin Clarity joined with the third wave of cards the same day and Compilatio with the fourth; PlagiarismCheck (seven platforms named) and Detecting-AI.com (Moodle) joined on 10 November 2026 with the ninth wave, and Trinka (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L on a platform-wide institutional line) with the tenth later the same day. ZeroGPT and Proofademic mention LMS or campus systems through an API without naming one, so they stay out. This page is one of three slices under AI detector features; the API slice and the modalities slice filter the same cards on other fields, and you can start from the full table to see all 72.
- Field 1LMS named as stated
- Field 2How the vendor says it is delivered
- Field 3Institution or team plan as checked
- Field 4Studies
One field and one rule: the vendor must name the platform. "Works with your LMS" does not qualify; "Canvas" does. The table also records how the vendor says the integration is delivered, because the same word covers a native plugin, a Chrome extension inside Google Classroom, an API a campus team wires up itself, and a report delivered through an existing plagiarism tool. Field rules are in the methodology. A district reader should pair this slice with the false positive rate ranking, since an integration puts a score in front of a teacher for every submission.
Which fields decide whether a detector has an LMS integration?
| Detector | LMS named as stated | How the vendor says it is delivered | Institution or team plan as checked | Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Winston AI | Google Classroom | Listed among integrations on the product page | Enterprise: Contact sales | 2 |
 Pangram | Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle, Brightspace (D2L) | Listed among integrations on the home page | Team: $40 / month, 2 seats | 0 |
 GPTZero | Google Classroom, Canvas | Chrome Extension covers Classroom; Canvas listed | Professional Team Plan: 500,000 words per member, per month; min 2 seats | 6 |
 Copyleaks | Canvas, D2L, Moodle, Blackboard, Schoology, Edsby, Sakai, Google Classroom | Listed among integrations on the product page | Education and Enterprise: Custom | 3 |
 Originality.ai | Google Classroom, Moodle | Google Classroom via Chrome extension; Moodle Plugin 2.0 | Enterprise (yearly) $136.58/month | 3 |
 Walter Writes | Canvas, Moodle, Schoology | LMS via API; native plugin not published | Teams (monthly) $139 billed monthly | 0 |
 Turnitin | Moodle, Blackboard, Canvas, etc. | Via the Similarity Report; no AI indicator embedded in the LMS user interface | Licence for Turnitin Originality; no free tier | 4 |
 Codequiry | Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard | Bulk import of submissions; LTI integration per the about page | Grow C$272 /mo as displayed (US$200 base), 1 instructor seat; LMS integrations on the Advanced add-on | 0 |
 Grammarly Authorship | Canvas | Authorship reports attached to Canvas LMS submissions, per the product page; a process record, not a classifier | Grammarly for Education, price by sales; Authorship is in Grammarly Free | 0 |
 Turnitin Clarity | Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L | LTI 1.3, "recommended for the optimal experience"; AI writing results only with the Originality add-on | Licensed separately at an additional cost to Feedback Studio customers; price by account manager | 0 |
 Compilatio | Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace (D2L), Blackboard (Learn and Learn Ultra), Open LMS, Cineca | Native plugins plus Microsoft Teams, LTI custom integration and SSO, per the LMS integration page | Magister+ by demo and quote; Magister Standard excludes AI detection | 1 |
 PlagiarismCheck | Canvas, Moodle, Google Classroom, Schoology, Brightspace, Blackboard and Populi | Listed as LMS integrations on the AI detector page, with the detector sold as TraceGPT inside the plagiarism checker and "educators can control their repository within integration" | Institutional plans by request; AI Checker plans from $2.99 a month for individuals | 1 |
 Detecting-AI.com | Moodle | An API-based connector for assignment text with a server-side API key, offered as a Moodle plugin or a direct REST integration | API plans from $15 a month for 100,000 words; no institutional tier stated | 0 |
 Trinka | Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L | "LMS & SSO Integration (Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L & more)" on the pricing page's Trinka for Institutions line, a platform-wide statement that does not name the detector | Enterprise and Institution: custom pricing; DocuMark, LMS and SSO integration for institutions | 0 |
Values as each vendor states them, read 8 November 2026, and 9 November 2026 for Codequiry. Pangram, Originality.ai and Walter Writes show a dollar symbol; Originality.ai and Walter Writes name USD, Pangram does not name a currency. Each LMS list and plan is linked to its vendor page in the note for that card below. Two pages added 9 November 2026 read this table further: the Canvas without Turnitin question tables the seven non-Turnitin cards that name Canvas with their plans, and the LMS coverage ranking counts the named platforms per card, Compilatio first at seven when Microsoft Teams is counted.
Why each card is in this view
- AIDI-D-0005Winston AI
the product page lists Google Classroom alongside a Chrome Extension, WordPress, Zapier and an API (gowinston.ai, read 8 November 2026); Enterprise is Contact sales (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0006Pangram
the home page names Google Classroom, Canvas, Moodle and Brightspace (D2L) (pangram.com, read 8 November 2026); the Team plan is $40 / month for 2 seats at $20 / seat (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0001GPTZero
the home page names Google Classroom and Canvas, with the Chrome Extension covering Classroom (gptzero.me, read 8 November 2026); the Professional Team Plan carries 500,000 words per member per month, minimum 2 seats (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0003Copyleaks
eight LMS names, the longest list in the index (copyleaks.com, read 8 November 2026); Education and Enterprise is custom (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0004Originality.ai
Google Classroom through the Chrome extension and a Moodle Plugin 2.0 (extensions page, read 8 November 2026); Enterprise is $136.58/month billed yearly with API access (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0015Walter Writes
the vendor names Canvas, Moodle and Schoology as LMS reached via API and states that a native plugin is not published (extension page, read 8 November 2026); Teams is $139 billed monthly for 10 team members (pricing).
- AIDI-D-0002Turnitin
the AI indicator sits inside the Similarity Report delivered through Moodle, Blackboard, Canvas and other LMSs, with none embedded in the LMS interface; detection is available only to customers licensing Turnitin Originality (Turnitin FAQ, read 8 November 2026).
- AIDI-D-0026Grammarly Authorship
the product page says Authorship reports can accompany Canvas LMS submissions; the report shows how a text was written and returns no AI probability (grammarly.com/authorship, read 9 November 2026).
- AIDI-D-0027Turnitin Clarity
the administrator FAQs name LTI 1.3 in Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L as the recommended route; Clarity records the writing process and shows AI writing results only when the Originality add-on is licensed (guides.turnitin.com, read 9 November 2026).
- AIDI-D-0032Compilatio
the LMS integration page names Moodle, Canvas, Brightspace, Blackboard Learn and Learn Ultra, Open LMS and Cineca, plus Microsoft Teams, LTI and SSO; the one indexed study, Weber-Wulff 2023, tested the free 2023 tool rather than the LMS product (compilatio.net, read 9 November 2026).
- AIDI-D-0020Codequiry
a source-code detector whose detection page lists bulk import from Canvas, Moodle and Blackboard, and whose about page names LTI (detection page, about, read 9 November 2026); Grow is shown at C$272 a month, converted by the page from a US$200 base, and LMS integrations sit on the Advanced add-on at C$406.64 a month as displayed (pricing, read 9 November 2026).
- AIDI-D-0046PlagiarismCheck
seven platforms named, six of them on the LMS coverage ranking's nine-platform list and Populi outside it (plagiarismcheck.org/ai-detector, read 9 November 2026); rank 13 of 14 in Weber-Wulff 2023, with 0 false accusations in 18.
- AIDI-D-0051Detecting-AI.com
Moodle through the vendor's API rather than a listed plugin (detecting-ai.com/integrations/moodle, read 10 November 2026); no study record.
- AIDI-D-0055Trinka
the pricing page names Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard and D2L for institutions as a platform line, not a detector line (trinka.ai/pricing, read 10 November 2026); institutional pricing is custom.
What the evidence says for institutions
The studies indexed here scored student writing, which is what an LMS integration feeds a detector. In Walters 2023, Copyleaks and Turnitin classified all 126 documents correctly with 0 false positives in 42 human papers, Originality.ai (model 1.4) classified 98% correctly with 0 incorrect, and GPTZero (Pro) 81% with a 2% false positive rate; the author notes the student papers could have been used to train the Turnitin detector (Walters 2023, publisher PDF, read 8 November 2026). In Weber-Wulff 2023, Turnitin ranked first of 14 tools with 41 of 54 documents correct and 0 false accusations in 18 human-written documents, Winston AI scored 36 of 54 with 0 false accusations, and GPTZero 29 of 54 with 9 false accusations in 18 (Weber-Wulff 2023, arXiv, read 8 November 2026).
Liang 2023 is the study for a campus with English learners: across seven detectors, including GPTZero and Originality.ai, the paper reports an average false positive rate of 61.22% on 91 human-written TOEFL essays (Liang 2023, arXiv, read 8 November 2026). In Perkins 2024, Turnitin fell from 50% on non-manipulated AI text to 7.9% after adversarial techniques (Perkins 2024, arXiv, read 8 November 2026). Pangram and Walter Writes appear in no study record. No detector score should be the only evidence in a misconduct or hiring decision, and an integration that scores every submission makes that rule harder to keep, not easier.
How does a Canvas AI detector reach the teacher?
Three different ways, on the vendors' own descriptions. Pangram, Copyleaks and GPTZero list Canvas as an integration without further detail on the pages the cards cite (pangram.com, copyleaks.com, gptzero.me, read 8 November 2026). Walter Writes reaches Canvas through its API, so a campus developer builds the connection (extension page, read 8 November 2026). Turnitin reaches Canvas through the Similarity Report a teacher already opens, with scores of 1% to 19% displayed as an asterisk (Turnitin FAQ, read 8 November 2026). Moodle follows the same split, with Originality.ai adding a Moodle Plugin 2.0 (originality.ai/extensions, read 8 November 2026).
One Turnitin product that reaches teachers through Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, Moodle and Sakai carries no detector at all: Gradescope, whose feature table lists AI-assisted grading and code similarity and no AI writing detection, and about which Turnitin's FAQ says it has no plans to add the capability (does Gradescope have AI detection?, read 9 November 2026).
Sources
- https://gowinston.ai/ai-content-detector/ (read 8 November 2026)
- https://gowinston.ai/pricing/ (read 8 November 2026)
- https://www.pangram.com/ (read 8 November 2026)
- https://www.pangram.com/pricing (read 8 November 2026)
- https://gptzero.me/ (read 8 November 2026)
- https://gptzero.me/pricing (read 8 November 2026)
- https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector (read 8 November 2026)
- https://copyleaks.com/pricing (read 8 November 2026)
- https://originality.ai/extensions (read 8 November 2026)
- https://originality.ai/pricing (read 8 November 2026)
- https://walterwrites.ai/chrome-extension/?utm_source=aidetectorindex.com&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=index_view_row (read 8 November 2026)
- https://walterwrites.ai/pricing/?utm_source=aidetectorindex.com&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=index_view_row (read 8 November 2026)
- https://guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/28477544839821-Turnitin-s-AI-writing-detection-capabilities-FAQs (read 8 November 2026)
- https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2022-0158/pdf (read 8 November 2026)
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.15666 (read 8 November 2026)
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.02819v3 (read 8 Novemb
2026-11-09: Gradescope question linked (fifth wave)
2026-11-09: Canvas question and LMS coverage ranking linked (seventh wave)
2026-11-10: PlagiarismCheck and Detecting-AI.com added (ninth wave)
2026-11-10: Trinka added (tenth wave)
FAQ: AI detector LMS integrations
Which AI detectors integrate with an LMS?
Eight cards name a learning management system: Winston AI, Pangram, GPTZero, Copyleaks, Originality.ai, Walter Writes and Turnitin as read on 8 November 2026, and Codequiry, a code detector, as read on 9 November 2026. Copyleaks names eight platforms, Pangram four, Walter Writes three via API, Codequiry three by bulk import, GPTZero and Originality.ai two each.
Is there a Canvas AI detector in the index?
Yes, six cards name Canvas: Pangram, GPTZero, Copyleaks, Walter Writes and Turnitin, all read 8 November 2026, and Codequiry for code submissions, read 9 November 2026. Pangram, GPTZero and Copyleaks list Canvas as an integration, Walter Writes reaches Canvas through its API, and Turnitin's AI indicator appears inside the Similarity Report that Canvas already displays.
Which detectors integrate with Moodle?
Four cards: Pangram and Copyleaks list Moodle, Originality.ai publishes a Moodle Plugin 2.0, and Turnitin delivers through the Similarity Report in Moodle, all as stated on 8 November 2026. Walter Writes names Moodle as reachable via API only.
Does an LMS integration change the detector's accuracy?
No study in the index tested a detector through an LMS; every record scored the product directly. Walters 2023 recorded 0 false positives in 42 human papers for Copyleaks, Originality.ai and Turnitin (publisher PDF, read 8 November 2026). The integration changes who sees the score, not the score.
